This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 4263 - [Primer] Add text to ignorable discussion on passing ignorable property of assertion to domain specific processing
Summary: [Primer] Add text to ignorable discussion on passing ignorable property of as...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WS-Policy
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Primer (show other bugs)
Version: FPWD
Hardware: Macintosh All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Felix Sasaki
QA Contact: Web Services Policy WG QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-01-18 22:19 UTC by Frederick Hirsch
Modified: 2007-03-13 22:34 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Frederick Hirsch 2007-01-18 22:19:50 UTC 
The new text added to primer on ignorable (as in issue 4041 and noted in resolution  http://www.w3.org/2007/01/18-ws-policy-irc#T22-08-44-1) should include explanation that domain specific processing should be aware of ignorable marking of assertion. (Thread about proposal for 4041 at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2007Jan/0187.html )

Proposal:

Add  following text proposed to be added at end of new section 3.4.1 Strict and Lax Policy Intersection 

"Domain specific processing should be made aware of whether assertions it is processing were marked as ignorable since that may impact domain specific processing."

[Note that this proposal is different from the following text which was removed from the original proposal for 4041

"When domain specific processing is to be performed in strict mode, it is up to that domain specific processing to interpret the Ignorable rattribute. In lax mode it is not relevant since ignorable assertions are not passed to the domain specific processing step of the intersection algorithm."]
Comment 1 Christopher Ferris 2007-03-13 22:34:19 UTC 
[18:31] cferris: Proposal: Add  following text proposed to be added at end of new  section 3.4.1 Strict and Lax Policy Intersection:
[18:32] cferris: 'Domain-specific processing could take advantage of any  information from the policy data model, such as the ignorable property of a policy assertion'.
[18:32] dmoberg: cferris: Any objections? None voiced
[18:33] cferris: RESOLUTION: close 4263 with proposal above
[18:33] cferris: rrsagent, where am i?
[18:33] RRSAgent: See http://www.w3.org/2007/03/13-ws-policy-irc#T22-33-55