This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Issue #37 of i18nCore comments: http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Section 6.6.3: Is there a reason an attribute has been used for rubyText, rather than an element?
Resolution: working group decides to have an element instead of an attribute, see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/17-i18nits-minutes.html#item04 . Action: editors to make the change.
ODD schema needed to implement the change
Action: Felix to make the change.
Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0328.html
Closed. Commenters satisfied see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0362.html
Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and to have rubyText as an element.