This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 2980 - [ScriptReq] possible generalization of the current semantics
Summary: [ScriptReq] possible generalization of the current semantics
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Scripting Extensions 3.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Working drafts
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andrew Eisenberg
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-07 01:35 UTC by Jim Melton
Modified: 2007-06-29 08:33 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Jim Melton 2006-03-07 01:35:26 UTC
(Originally reported by Dana F.)

Should we allow multiple update expressions to share a common prolog and to be
executed sequentially? The syntax would look like P E; E; E

As a generalization of the above, should we allow any update expression to
consist of multiple updates separated by a sequencing semicolon operator? The syntax would look like do U1; U2; U3
Comment 1 Jim Melton 2007-06-29 08:33:47 UTC
This requirement has been accepted for the Scripting Extension Requirements.