This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 27115 - [FO30] duplicate entry in appendix D Checklist of implementation-defined features (Non-Normative)
Summary: [FO30] duplicate entry in appendix D Checklist of implementation-defined feat...
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Functions and Operators 3.1 (show other bugs)
Version: Recommendation
Hardware: PC Windows NT
: P2 trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael Kay
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-10-20 21:20 UTC by Abel Braaksma
Modified: 2015-05-14 21:54 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Abel Braaksma 2014-10-20 21:20:06 UTC 
Probably just editorial, item 27 and 28 are equal:

27. All minimally conforming processors ·must· support positive year values with a minimum of 4 digits (i.e., YYYY) and a minimum fractional second precision of 1 millisecond or three digits (i.e., s.sss). However, conforming processors ·may· set larger ·implementation-defined· limits on the maximum number of digits they support in these two situations. Processors ·may· also choose to support the year 0000 and years with negative values. The results of operations on dates that cross the year 0000 are ·implementation-defined·. (See Limits and precision.)

is equal to:

28. All minimally conforming processors ·must· support positive year values with a minimum of 4 digits (i.e., YYYY) and a minimum fractional second precision of 1 millisecond or three digits (i.e., s.sss). However, conforming processors ·may· set larger ·implementation-defined· limits on the maximum number of digits they support in these two situations. Processors ·may· also choose to support the year 0000 and years with negative values. The results of operations on dates that cross the year 0000 are ·implementation-defined·. (See Limits and precision.)
Comment 1 Abel Braaksma 2014-10-20 21:21:04 UTC 
PS: this is in the F&O 3.0 REC (http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-30)
Comment 2 Michael Kay 2015-02-10 17:29:57 UTC 
The problem occurs because the "implementation-defined" markup occurs twice in the same paragraph and the stylesheet is not eliminating duplicates. I have changed the stylesheet to eliminate duplicates; leaving the bug open until I have verified that this works.
Comment 3 Michael Kay 2015-05-13 08:42:28 UTC 
The stylsheet change appears to have worked its magic.