This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 18220 - drawImage should accept SVGImageElement
Summary: drawImage should accept SVGImageElement
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML Canvas 2D Context (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jay Munro
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard: exclusion whatwg-resolved
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-07-18 17:43 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2017-06-08 05:49 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2012-07-18 17:43:46 UTC 
This was was cloned from bug 17427 as part of operation convergence.
Originally filed: 2012-06-05 20:25:00 +0000

================================================================================
 #0   contributor@whatwg.org                          2012-06-05 20:25:39 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-canvas-element.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#2dcontext
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#2dcontext

Comment:
drawImage should accept SVGImageElement

Posted from: 71.184.125.56 by bzbarsky@mit.edu
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0 Firefox/15.0a1
================================================================================
 #1   Boris Zbarsky                                   2012-06-05 20:26:10 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We're trying to converge <hgml:img> and <svg:image> as much as we can, as I understand.
================================================================================
Comment 1 Erika Doyle Navara 2012-08-15 21:46:18 UTC 
Moved to HTML Canvas 2D Context.
Comment 2 rcabanie 2012-08-22 16:24:26 UTC 
It probably makes sense to have this.
Moving to HTML.next
Comment 3 Robin Berjon 2013-01-21 16:00:33 UTC 
Mass move to "HTML WG"
Comment 4 Robin Berjon 2013-01-21 16:03:13 UTC 
Mass move to "HTML WG"