This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1388 - [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.3 Reserved Function Names
Summary: [XQuery] some editorial comments on A.3 Reserved Function Names
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: XQuery 1.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Last Call drafts
Hardware: All All
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Scott Boag
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-11 07:41 UTC by Michael Dyck
Modified: 2007-02-25 23:54 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Michael Dyck 2005-05-11 07:41:22 UTC 
A.3 Reserved Function Names

"The following names are not recognized as function names in an unprefixed form
because expression syntax takes precedence."
    Change "recognized" to "allowed".

    Use of the word "precedence" may suggest an unintended connection to A.4.
Comment 1 Scott Boag 2005-07-09 21:17:02 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> A.3 Reserved Function Names
> 
> "The following names are not recognized as function names in an unprefixed form
> because expression syntax takes precedence."
>     Change "recognized" to "allowed".
> 
>     Use of the word "precedence" may suggest an unintended connection to A.4.

Done.
Comment 2 Scott Boag 2005-07-22 19:31:28 UTC 
A joint meeting of the Query and XSLT working groups considered this comment on 
July 20, 2005.  

The WGs agreed to resolve these editorial issues as listed in my previous comment.

If you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why.
If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then change the Status
of the record to Reopened. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we
will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Comment 3 Jim Melton 2007-02-25 23:54:23 UTC 
Closing bug because commenter has not objected to the resolution posted and more than two weeks have passed.