This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-func-op-review.html Comment ID: 7
new version of the comment (consensus of i18n-core-wg, telecon 25 may 2005): You make several references to the character model specifications. Please be aware that there are several specifications which have been created out of one, e.g. Fundamentals, Normalization and Resource Identifiers. Be careful to point to the right one, e.g. when you are talking about normalization.
On 7/21/2005 the joint WGs accepted Paul Cotton's analysis of this issue in the (member-only) note http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-query/2005Jul/0053.html and decided to make the recommended changes and close the issue. The text of the note is below: ACTION: A-258-03 Paul will draft text that correctly references the charmod specs as noted in 1359 1359 please verify references to the various parts of the charmod-specs http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1359 "You make several references to the character model specifications. Please be aware that there are several specifications which have been created out of one, e.g. Fundamentals, Normalization and Resource Identifiers. Be careful to point to the right one, e.g. when you are talking about normalization." 1. Functions and Operators Section 7.2.1 Collations "Thus, the [Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Fundamentals] recommends that all strings be subjected to early Unicode normalization and some collations will raise runtime errors if they encounter strings that are not properly normalized." This text references the wrong document and should point to "[Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Normalization]". This reference already exists in the F&O document. 2. Functions and Operators Section 7.4.6 fn:normalize-unicode "See [Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Normalization] for a description of the normalization forms." This reference is correct. 3. Other Character Model references. I have checked the other Character Model references in F&O and they appear to be correct. /paulc