ISSUE-429: Glyph vs code point in HRM

Glyph vs code point in HRM

State:

CLOSED

Product:

TTML IMSC 1.0

Raised by:

Glenn Adams

Opened on:

2015-09-21

Description:

The statement "Gr and Gc shall include only glyphs in presented regions and shall not include a [UNICODE] Code Point if it does not result in a change to presentation, e.g. the Code Point is ignored." is rather unusual in that it erroneously refers to glyphs in terms of a Unicode Code Point. Glyphs and glyphs codes are not directly related to Unicode code points. It would be better to say that a glyph that does not contain any renderable outline is ignored. But that is rather redundant since font designers do not include glyphs in fonts that do not have a renderable outline.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. {minutes} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-29 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-29)
2. {minutes} TTWG Meeting 2015-09-24 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-09-24)
3. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-09-24 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-09-23)
4. ISSUE-429: Glyph vs code point in HRM [TTML IMSC 1.0] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-09-21)

Related notes:

Display change log