ISSUE-424: Awkward text re: smpte:backgroundImage dimensions
Awkward text re: smpte:backgroundImage dimensions
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- TTML IMSC 1.0
- Raised by:
- Glenn Adams
- Opened on:
- 2015-09-21
- Description:
- "the width and height of the region extent associated with the div element shall be specified and shall be equal to the width and height of the image source referenced by smpte:backgroundImage;"
IIUC, this should be written as follows:
"the width and height of the image source referenced by smpte:backgroundImage shall be equal to width and height of the extent of the region in which the div element is presented;"
Note that this places the requirement on the image geometry and not on the div element. Also, this needs normative language regarding what to do in case this constraint is violated by the image geometry.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- {minutes} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-15 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-15)
- RE: {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-08 (from mdolan@newtbt.com on 2015-10-08)
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-08 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-07)
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-01 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-01)
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-09-24 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-09-23)
- Update re: outstanding IMSC1 issues (from pal@sandflow.com on 2015-09-21)
- ISSUE-424: Awkward text re: smpte:backgroundImage dimensions [TTML IMSC 1.0] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-09-21)
Related notes:
Addressed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/f5d71ba79f7c
As indicated in the conformance section, the specification does not specify processor behavior in the presence of non-conformant documents.
Then perhaps informative advice could be provided.
Glenn Adams, 24 Sep 2015, 15:09:05[nigel]: [Meeting 2015-10-15] Agreed to close since no wording for non-conformance handling has been proposed, by anyone.
15 Oct 2015, 16:01:31Display change log