ISSUE-412: The term 'SHALL' should not be used in the definition of Related Video Object
The term 'SHALL' should not be used in the definition of Related Video Object
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- TTML IMSC 1.0
- Raised by:
- Glenn Adams
- Opened on:
- 2015-09-03
- Description:
- The term 'SHALL' should not be used in Section 6.5 in the following:
which shall consist of a sequence of image frames, each a rectangular array of pixels, and shall be considered theRelated Media Object.
The content of the related media object is irrelevant to IMSC/TTML, and, in any case, is not reasonably testable in the context of IMSC/TTML. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- {minutes} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-15 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-15)
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-15 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-14)
- RE: {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-08 (from mdolan@newtbt.com on 2015-10-08)
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-08 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-07)
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-01 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-01)
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-09-24 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-09-23)
- {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-09-03 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-09-03)
- ISSUE-412: The term 'SHALL' should not be used in the definition of Related Video Object [TTML IMSC 1.0] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-09-03)
Related notes:
Section 6.5 is intended to define "Related Video Object", which is used to specify mapping of time expressions to frames -- which is pulled from DECE.
It probably can be moved to the "Terms and Definitions" section and reworded without conformance terms:
"""
Related Video Object. Related Media Object that consists of a sequence of image frames, each a rectangular array of pixels.
"""
Addressed at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/9bae3a7eb823
Pierre-Anthony Lemieux, 21 Sep 2015, 18:31:28Display change log
