- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 02 Dec 2002 16:22:07 -0600
- To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
- Cc: WebOnt <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 16:10, Jeff Heflin wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Based on feedback via e-mail and the telecon of 11/21, here is a revised > proposal for ontology versioning. This message is divided into the core > proposal, and two options about how it should be included in OWL. > > > CORE PROPOSAL > --------------- > I propose to add the following identifiers to the OWL namespace: > > priorVersion > backCompatWith > deprecatedClass > deprecatedProperty hmm... still no versionOf, i.e. no relationship between a specific version and the generic thing that it's a version of, as I requested 20 Nov. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Nov/0242.html Everything else about this proposal looks fine, but I still think versionOf is as important as priorVersion. [...] > OPTIONS: > Two options have been suggested for how this proposal would be > incorporated into OWL. > > Option #1: > ----------- > Make the proposal normative. The reference, guide, and feature synopsis > would be updated appropriately. > > Option #2: > ---------- > Make the proposal non-normative. I don't see any motivation for option 2 at all. > [1] http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/plus/SHOE/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 17:21:54 UTC