W3C

– DRAFT –
Maturity Model Task Force

19 August 2026

Attendees

Present
CharlesL, Fazio, janina, JeffAdams-UN, jkline, Mark_Miller, Neha, Sheri_B-H, stacey, SusiPallero
Regrets
-
Chair
David Fazio
Scribe
Neha

Meeting minutes

New Business

CharlesL: I will there at TPAC 2026

CharlesL: Tpac travel query

Timeline to 1.1 Publication

Fazio: Neha has merged PR for the changes regarding Abstract, Introduction and nesting of dimensions

Fazio: Did you get a chance to look into AI stuff?

Sheri_B-H: Still need to check that, maybe by Friday, so we can discuss in the group

CharlesL: Editor's note needs to be added with correct class

JeffAdams-UN: I have some notes or things to discuss where should I put this?

Fazio: Github issue section is a good place to go for that

janina: Big thing that we have fixed these changes, we should really focus on this new version of the document,

janina: we should try for first working draft in the first week of October

Fazio: we should have a thought on scoring

janina: Do we have it in narrative? No then why we should take another look?

Sheri_B-H: Scoring can be considered in the next version

jlkine: Spreadsheet has scoring option

janina: Spreadsheet is not spec

janina: we should come up with questions

<Fazio> usability of doc

Github Issue #374 Removing Disability Inclusion From The Document

<Fazio> w3c/maturity-model#374

<gb> Issue 374 Removing Disability Inclusion From The Document (by Helixopp)

Fazio: mentioning where Disability Inclusion is included

Fazio: change - Training is available to enhance knowledge and skills around ICT accessibility and disability inclusion to 'Training is available to enhance knowledge and skills around ICT accessibility and inclusive design' or 'Training is available to enhance knowledge and skills around ICT accessibility and accessible design'

Fazio: stacey if you can do usability testing of the doc

stacey I will

Fazio: disability inclusion from personnel dimension

Fazio: do we want to just say policies and not only related to personnel?

<SusiPallero> +1 to keep it general

janina: I would keep it to general that is policies and statements

<Mark_Miller> +1 to keep it general

<SusiPallero> Suggestion: change "position" by "role and responsibilities"

Fazio: Actual statement - Plans are in place for providing disability inclusion training, relevant to each individual’s position.

<Mark_Miller> Plans are in place for providing role based ? training.

Fazio: Knowledge and Skills dimension has one occurance of disabilit and inclusion

Mark_Miller: Accessibility training

Mark_Miller: Plans are in place for providing accessibility training,

<CharlesL> what about "Role relevant training...

<Mark_Miller> Role relevent ICT training is available...

<Fazio> Training is available to enhance role relevant ICT accessibility knowledge and skills

janina: let's add role relevant

<Mark_Miller> .... to enchance accessibility knowlage and skill.

Mark_Miller Role relevent ICT training is available to enchance accessibility knowlage and skill.

Fazio: Given - Plans are in place for providing disability inclusion training, relevant to each individual’s position

<Mark_Miller> Role relevent accessibility training

Fazio: Suggestion: Plans are in place to provide role relevant ICT training to enhance accessbility knowlage and skill? Still discussing

<Mark_Miller> Plans are in place to provide role relevent ICT training

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 248 (Mon Oct 27 20:04:16 2025 UTC).

Diagnostics

Maybe present: jlkine

All speakers: CharlesL, Fazio, janina, JeffAdams-UN, jlkine, Mark_Miller, Sheri_B-H

Active on IRC: CharlesL, Fazio, janina, JeffAdams-UN, jkline, Mark_Miller, Neha, Sheri_B-H, stacey, SusiPallero