Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
<matatk> Interesting bug report: anthropics/
Issue is raised for inaccessbility of generated claude code
Neha: Neha started non profit organization for creating STEM accessible content for school kids
TPAC 2026
<matatk> https://
All details on the wiki page
Discussion on proposed meetings
We will be meeting 13th July with Web AI
RQTF will be joining
Taxanomy of accessibility features which media platforms should have - will be good i we can work on that
Roy: we do not have confirmation from web AI group
Roy: Web n AI interest group do not have a good number of participation
Paul: LLM poisoning or AI poisoning - adding some content which is not making any sense and malicious. Both have impact on a11y. eg. adding wrong content in subtitle files
Paul: people do this to protect their IPs but that wil sabotage a11y
Paul: we should have some community group to dedicate time for this
<Roy_Ruoxi> https://
Roy: WebAI group is also tracking this with above link
janina: ethical principle publication can be something related to this
Paul: I can raise an issue and help in planning this
matatk: Web machine learning group, webai, technical architecture group, ethical web principles, privacy principles
matatk: ethical web principles will be perfect place to start
New charters review
Web Machine Learning Group Charter - WebMCP
<Roy_Ruoxi> - Charter: w3c/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - TAG issue: w3ctag/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - a11y-tracker issue: webmachinelearning/
<Roy_Ruoxi> - a11y-tracker issue: webmachinelearning/
Roy: they are asking to do horizontal review in advance
They are tranforming from community to working group
Roy: Ask us to review their tech knowledge from TAG issue link
janina: Do we have to review before forming the group?
matatk: I think we have to check - a11y consideration for webMCP specs
janina: DO we object formation of webmcp working group formation?
matatk: accessibility tree and redundency discussion - people have objection on adding sematics to accessibility tree as machine may use this instead of ATs
matatk: I will see how we can articulate and put it in the tracker
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to suggest this means we'll need an AI AUR
janina: As per me, i suspect if we need this review before forming this group
PaulG: I agree we should review it
PaulG: capabilities should be checked whic hare offered by webmcp
matatk: I will try to setup something, where people can assign these issues to themselves and work on it
New on TR
<matatk> https://
<Roy_Ruoxi> w3c/
matatk: this is low level, we can move on
Spec review requests
matatk: epub 3.4, we have to do quick turn around it
matatk: No objection on the proposed agenda
WAI-ARIA 1.3
<matatk> w3c/
<matatk> Significant changes: https://
matatk: what concern me about it with aria-head and aria-footer, are they going to be landmark roles or not
matatk: I could see they are not, so how will it be helpful for AT users
<PaulG> +1
<Neha> +1
<Roy_Ruoxi> +1
matatk: several question relatedd to this use case
matatk: all other changes are good
Issue tracking
HTML custom spelling dictionary
<matatk> w3c/