– DRAFT –
COGA review of WCAG 3

<Lisa> hi

Aligning on Animation issues

ISSUE: Provide explicit text explanations for implied meaning conveyed via animations

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jLkvaCNxpk1xJ-yuyTWciizRe3GkGWPc-3yu6ZJLIqg/edit?pli=1&tab=t.7btf7qjplo1i#heading=h.lgrk7e7ginyw

Let's hold off on discussing emojis--that should be part of Text and Wording conversation.

What is this draft issue trying to say is missing from the Animation section?

Lisa: I think we want animations to be explained but helpful.

Lisa: We can say we're not sure the extent to which this occurs or is a problem, but it may be worth further research.

LenB: We use animations as a teaching tool and a learning tool, such as a moving window that can be hidden into a doc.

LenB: These are examples of animations that you can turn off at a platform level.

LenB: The definition of animation seems to be missing from WCAG 3.

LenB: I don't know that I would want a text explanation of a moving window.

LenB: Maybe animations that are part of instructional UI can be an exception to this issue? Those things should be able to be turned off, which WCAG 3 has provisions for.

repasting the link to this issue: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jLkvaCNxpk1xJ-yuyTWciizRe3GkGWPc-3yu6ZJLIqg/edit?pli=1&tab=t.7btf7qjplo1i#heading=h.lgrk7e7ginyw

Link to the animation and movement: https://w3c.github.io/wcag3/guidelines/#animation-and-movement

ISSUE: Provide system wide options for trigger warnings for cognitively stressful content.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jLkvaCNxpk1xJ-yuyTWciizRe3GkGWPc-3yu6ZJLIqg/edit?pli=1&tab=t.7btf7qjplo1i#heading=h.qcpxssuw9f1

Group is discussing major concerns with two draft provisions:

Trigger warnings available uses a very narrow view of what counts as triggering -- it is only talking about animations that can trigger physical reactions.

Safe content review is a broadly worded assertion that covers more than animations, such as violent content.

In addition to concerns about these two provisions, we want to create a separate issue about the need for users to have control/preferences about how trigger warnings are presented.

We're still discussing Animation: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jLkvaCNxpk1xJ-yuyTWciizRe3GkGWPc-3yu6ZJLIqg/edit?pli=1&tab=t.7btf7qjplo1i

ISSUE: User Setting Support for haptics is missing in WCAG 3

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jLkvaCNxpk1xJ-yuyTWciizRe3GkGWPc-3yu6ZJLIqg/edit?pli=1&tab=t.7btf7qjplo1i#heading=h.khn32rszxrpf

Reworded to make clearer what our concerns are.

ISSUE: Provide scenarios related to culture, common time and places where trigger warnings might be starting, changing or ending

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jLkvaCNxpk1xJ-yuyTWciizRe3GkGWPc-3yu6ZJLIqg/edit?pli=1&tab=t.7btf7qjplo1i#heading=h.too1w7fcqw58

Do we still need this?

We looked at the "cultural" sentence we added to the issue about "Safe content review" and debated whether that sentence is sufficient and we can remove this separate issue.