Meeting minutes
How to handle unknow mappings
Zakk: I suggest we use some sort of TBD to indicate we're not clear on mappings. The ones we know we can proceed, but this ones we can discuss later and get broader feedback
Daniel: Sounds good to me
… There would still be a couple of questions for you on export 7
… For now I'd wait untill we have all bulk tables ready and then we'd alphabetize all of them together
… After the final alphabetizing we would have something close to the FPWD
Daniel: We need to get approval from the Working Group, then we need to go through PubRules
Zaak: If there's a list of things respec does, I'd like to have apointer to that
Daniel: That's the closest we have. I could try to put a list of things that I know respec does off the top of my head so that it's easiesr and quicker to process
Duff: Daniel and I will be meeting on Friday
Daniel: Basically to help things mov forward for the recharter period
Zakk: I don't see how throwing more resources could help at this point for now
… Once we get FPWD out we would love to get more input from other ARIA Editors
Duff: I'd have guess if we published with a TBD on one of our elements, is that the context in which we'd invite others in?
Zakk: Getting the confirmation that we can put TBD on the FPWD helps clarify.
… Then we can start opening individual issues and there's where I see more resources would be needed
Duff: Do you think we can get this PR for this 2nd quarter?
Zakk: There is some formating issues that we are going through, hopefully at leeast the scripting work can be done for 2nd quarter
Duff: Is that specialized work?
Zakk: Let me get to my next milestone, we can look at what the xport looks like and then we can look at creating a list to make it clearer for others what to check
Patrick: We have to be sure when we have scope or headers they are capitalized and between backticks
Paul: Should we do some of this on the sheet first?
Zaak: It'd help