scribe+

standup

giacomo-petri: wcag3 topic, verify consistency through page views requires a broader scope. Applicability is challenging

kathy: in a recent rule review, it had applicability to content and examples of pages which I didn't think were correct. my subgroup also has difficulty with terminology

shunguo: working on interactive subgroup, going pretty well

jean-yves: looking at rule sound not relied upon. not sure generic rules will work in the end.
... they are getting used to ACT

shunguo: rule is very composite. a good start

jean-yves: maybe they picked a rule that is too difficult to start with.
... not specific enough, what does it mean
... think it will improve

shunguo: suggested use ACT rules to replace their examples
... if ACT can be part of WCAG spec, it's a good sign

kathy: technical language seems to be a challenge for all subgroups

jean-yves: having examples would help
... if applicability and expectation are too technical, we as liaisons can ask questions to help get them to reduce ambiguity
... rules are for a technical audience

giacomo-petri: need clarifications or it will be too generic

shunguo: I try to push that wcag requirement is clear as possible, list exceptions so ACT rule can be followed strictly
... if requirement has issues then bigger problem

godwin: my subgroup has technical folks but are still struggling with ACT

why isn't ACT writing the rules

kathy: the scag 3 requirements are still in draft and the ACT rule writing has helped my subgroup refine the requirement

giacomo-petri: applying ACT rules is helpful to refine and understand severity, principles and requirements

godwin: agree, but seeing the group struggle with ACT structure

giacomo-petri: maybe start with creating examples, agree to pass and fail
... demonstrate the feasibility of the requirement to move forward

godwin: will this content be moved to ACT?

giacomo-petri: it could be

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i_O5J7D4BWMZAB7NaD4iplDRuqOjCvCGAaHdAirLUhE/edit?tab=t.bo2e33svugxv#heading=h.8k3m19m21u2

<giacomo-petri> https://github.com/w3c/wcag3/wiki

This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Default Present: Kathy, giacomo-petri, Jean-Yves
Present: Kathy, giacomo-petri, Jean-Yves
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Kathy
Inferring Scribes: Kathy

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth


WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)