Meeting minutes
New PR Triage
<github-bot> I can't comment on that because it doesn't look like a github issue to me.
editorial: w3c/
pkra: about weird aria markup in our spec
matt_king: so you no long have to use separate tags for properties and states?
pkra: not yet and I'm not sure jamesn supports
jamesn: I'm fine if you do it
WPT Open PRs
<github-bot> I can't comment on that because it doesn't look like a github issue to me.
Deep Dive planning
<github-bot> I can't comment on that because it doesn't look like a github issue to me.
spectranaut_: we will have once a month aria orientations -- coming soon!
Jacques: if folks are interested, I'd love to talk about focusgroup
Jacques: realistically, I encourage folks to read the proposal, and if they have questions want a deep dive we can schedule one
Jacques: but if no one has any questions, and are find with it, it seems fine
Jacques: to not have a deep dive
Should :target-current pseudo class also imply aria-current=true on an active scroll marker?
Rahim: while going through my notifications, I realized this a dupe
Rahim: so maybe this one can be closed?
Jacques: this was opened for the purpose of creating an agenda item for this group?
jamesn: and the one in css-aam has enough context, the same information? I suppose you can reference back
jamesn: I can take a look and make sure css-aam has the right permissions, and can add labels like agenda, etc
Rahim: I quick question about hte issue, I skimmed through it -- the target current pseudo class, it is for scroll markerts?
Jacques: I don't have all that much context, I was just a liaison to get it discussed in the group
Jacques: direct your questions to them, maybe in the css-aam issue
Rahim: so this maps to aria-current, the aria-current attribute is not added to the content, the AT convey that this is current
(someone): yes that is right
Change tooltip to name prohibited
jamesn: we have an issue you filed against ACT, it sounds like this doesn't impact ACT tests, but we break anything so we can merge it?
giacomo-petri: yes
jamesn: we can merge it!
Matt_King: this requires an APG practices update
jamesn: does this prevent merging?
Matt_King: just the creation of the issue, before merge
scott: I'll make an issue
spectranaut_: merge it!!
jamesn: merging
[html-aam PR 510] switch attribute for checkbox inputs
Rahim: I wanted to know next steps
spectranaut_: can you put the checkboxs, and link to the html issue?
Rahim: yes