Meeting minutes
Agenda review
Nigel: One PR on DAPT on DAPT/IMSC compatibility
… For IMSC 1.3, there are open PRs, nothing flagged for the agenda
… Any other topics?
… I have an AOB regarding Pierre
(nothing)
DAPT
CRS publication
Nigel: This was published on 18 December
… Aside from Informative changes that require a new CRS, this might be the last one
… For the implementation report, we haven't worked out what to do about the current implementation
… I haven't open sourced the BBC implementation yet
… When can we organise that?
Cyril: Week after next should be fine
… Week of Jan 26th
Nigel: Let's aim for that, and that'll push me to do the open sourcing
Nigel: We need to work out how to describe this in the implementation report
… Generating content isn't the same thing as passing tests
Cyril: We need two passing implementations, they don't both need to be validation tools
… If the authoring tool creates content that represents the same features [...]
… We may have an issue with invalid features, as the authoring tool won't generate invalid content
Nigel: We need two implementations of each feature
… The test is a validation test. If we show the implementation generates content that is good according to a validator that passes valid and invalid tests, we're good
… If content fails validation, I'd say it's not a valid implementation of the feature
Cyril: So have a table showing, for each feature, how many implementations are passing, then in the cell how many implementations are validating and how many are creating
Nigel: Something like that, yes. We currently have a "tests passed" column, we could have a feature implementation column
Nigel: [checks the CR exit criteria]
Nigel: What we document in the table is the number of independent implementations of the feature
… We can say what type of implementation that is, to make it clear
… So we'll need to refactor that table in the implementation report
Cyril: The one feature our tool doesn't implement is the audio tag
Nigel: There is one feature for that, #xmlLang-audio-nonMatching
… For that we need to create content and check the language is not different from the parent
… We also have to deal with all the at-risk features
DAPT/IMSC compatibility
Nigel: We have one PR open, #333. Pierre made some comments, that I still need to finish responding to
… Add DAPT signalling to the IMSC signalling section. I need to move the IMSC signalling section in the DAPT spec somewhere else
… I need to do an editorial pass to fix this. We have references to 3 different versions of IMSC, which isn't intentional
… All informative changes. It'll need review
IMSC 1.3
Nigel: CRS publication also happened on 18 December
… There are a few PRs open, but none marked for the agenda today
… Some PRs have been merged since our last call. That triggered a new CR Draft
… The most recent publication is 20th December
… I don't think there's any reason we need another CR Snapshot as we're not expecting to make more substantive changes
… Anything to discuss on IMSC 1.3?
(nothing)
AOB
Nigel: As mentioned at the end of our last call, MovieLabs is no longer a W3C member, and we're working to see if we can find a way to accept Pierre's offer to continue shepherding IMSC 1.3 to Recommendation
Nigel: Anything else?
(nothing)
Meeting close
Nigel: Next call in 2 weeks time
[adjourned]