Meeting minutes
<Jem> https://
Agenda check-in
New meeting cadence and slack channel
Jem: We are talking about having a biweekly meeting, and we've set up a new slack channel in the W3C Community slack
Jem: You can join the workspace and then we can start inviting you to the channel
<Jem> https://
Jem: I created a google form to collect answers for the biweekly meeting
Jem: Several options, times, and week days
Daniel: If we are going to keep this time, I'd request that we pick the other week, the one that doesn't intercept with my WAI Team meeting
Matt_King: We should add other days that are missing
… Monday, Tuesday, Friday, 11, 12, 1, and 2
Matt_King: We could do 9, 10, 11, others are late in Europe
… Do we want to run this poll now or we could extend it through the holiday?
Matt_King: We could open the poll right now and close it before the meeting on the 6th, then discuss options
Daniel: 6 Jan should be fine, WAI starts 13 Jan
Matt_King: If we are to keep this time we can start the biweekly session 20 Jan onwards
Publication planning
<Jem> 2025-12-17 December 2025 APG publication Milestone
<Jem> https://
Matt_King: Two items pending. Adam, thanks for your review on John's PR
… We'd requested Adam, Siri, and Ari for review. Ari or Siri, could you please review?
Ari: Seems to be working well in android
… I could take a look today
3372 List box example with aria actions
Github: w3c/
Matt_King: Couple of things to fix
… Checks failing
CurtBellew: I took a look at this. Can we run these locally?
Matt_King: Somewhere on the wiki there are instructions for that
jongund: npm instll, and then run regression, and then you give the path to the test you want to run
CurtBellew: I'll go through the wiki
Matt_King: I am unsure about check example coverage
<CurtBellew> https://
<Jem> https://
Jem: We wrote docs about regression tests
JoeLamyman: I can review the docs
<Jem> Joe lamyman
Matt_King: We have documentation in the repo readme and it points to other places in the wiki
… It'd be good for the readme to act as a good starting point for all the rest
JoeLamyman: Sounds great
<Jem> Joe may be help with reviewing the regression test for apg example pages, https://
Jem: I'll create the issue and assign it to you
Matt_King: If we are publishing next week we should have people reviewing it next week
… Code review, functional review, visual design review
JoeLamyman: Is there documentation about review process?
<Jem> here is the review process
<Jem> https://
Matt_King: We have standard markup for a PR review, each step of the process includes a link to each step of the review
… If you want to do code review I can put your name on that
JoeLamyman: Sounds good, I can do it
Ari: I could help review too
PR 3386: Update APG support tables
Matt_King: Jon, if you could do the newer ones especially for the accordeion. There should be a heading with AT support tables underneath.
… Click the buttons and make sure it goes to the right place
Jem: This is an APG pattern website. The AT support data comes from the ARIA-AT project
… We need to make sure that the data goes to the right place and that it's accurate
Matt_King: Ari, you'll be doing the first eight
jongund: From the PR?
Matt_King: Yes, production is not showing them at all. We change the structure on the ARIA-AT repo
PR 3387: Guidance on focusability of disabled controls
Matt_King: I'll review this one, Adam is not here today
… Not enough time to go over these other two today