– DRAFT –
APA Weekly Teleconference

Agenda Review & Announcements

COGA TF Research: Issue Papers - forthcoming CfC

<matatk6> https://raw.githack.com/w3c/coga/research-modules-wd-1/issue-papers/index.html - and the 4 linked issue paper documents (under the 'Modules' section)

matatk6: COGA has written a issue paper after a research in differrent areas

matatk6: COGA is looking for a wide review

matatk6: It is very high level document and we are only looking for showstoppers

TPAC 2025 wrap-up, part 1

matatk6: I will be writting a report but we are improving review process

matatk6: how to make horizontal process easier

matatk6: Tool people will be happy to let us do changes in the tool

matatk6: We also discussed about asynchronous working mode during TPAC

matatk6: Chiara and Neha are planning to create a FAQ like a document to make process easy

matatk6: We will get a guideline to manage issues in the repo

matatk6: We had meetings with ARIA, media entertainment group (accessibility features in media related stuff),

New charters

Pointer Events WG

<matatk6> w3c/a11y-request#135

<Glenda> +1

matatk6: There is not extra deliverables, or there is not a significant change

<stevef> +1

<matatk6> +1

<chiace> +1

matatk6: I would say I am okay with this Charter

<Neha> +1

Dataset Exchange WG

<matatk6> w3c/a11y-request#136

matatk6: No diff from previous Charter

matatk6: This is very low level and same is pointer out by Roy_Ruoxi

matatk6: No reason to object this

<Roy_Ruoxi> +1

<matatk6> +1

<Neha> +1

<stevef> +1

<JenStrickland> +1

<tsaulter> +1

<Glenda> +1

New on TR

Spec review requests

2025-11-24: SHACL 1.2 Core

<matatk6> w3c/data-shapes#633

<Fredrik> The question is: is the screener a screamer and the FAST checklist a whiner?

matatk6: We have two quationnaires - 1. Screener from TAG and 2. FAST checklist by FAST task force

matatk6: Someone at TPAC has made is tool to check on FAST checklist

<matatk6> w3c/a11y-request#134

matatk6: This is very very low level

JenStrickland: This is looking like a overload, what is the story around this application?

<chiace> The page linked to FAST appears to be returning a 404 error. Is it possible? https://fast-rose.vercel.app/

<chiace> https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/

<Roy_Ruoxi> should be this one: https://w3c.github.io/fast/

matatk6: We have our own FAST checklist HTML version tool which creates a github issue

matatk6: We will come back to this as a general horizontal review process

<chiace> Thank you Roy_Ruoxi!

matatk6: Can someone review this and we will streamline the process of review

<chiace> I can help as well :)

Issue tracking

Spec review requests

2025-10-27: Web Sustainability Guidelines

<matatk6> w3c/a11y-request#133

<matatk6> tracking: w3c/a11y-tracking#270

<JenStrickland> Sounds good to me. Let me know when you need me.

Glenda: Jen and I will confirm what is our understanding on the steps which we have to do in this issue

2025-11-30: Accessibility Implementation Guidelines (DVB BlueBook A185)

<matatk6> https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/132) (update post-TPAC)

matatk6: Janina and I would be working on the showstoppers from this list

Issue tracking

Discrepancy between ARIA 1.2 role requirements and HTML Living Standard table naming requirements

<matatk6> w3c/a11y-tracking#271

Steve: I closed this issue just now,as it does not require resolving

RRSagent , make minutes

rssagent, end meeting