W3C

– DRAFT –
Maturity Model Task Force

05 November 2025

Attendees

Present
Dr_Keith, Fazio, janina, jkline, Mark_Miller, Neha, Sheri_B-H, SusiPallero
Regrets
-
Chair
David Fazio
Scribe
Neha

Meeting minutes

New Business

<janina> e-champaigne all around!

sheri: someone from office of colorado is using maturity model

janina: we should collect all these reviews and feedbacks somewhere

Fazio: new invites to join task force

<Fazio> w3c/breakouts-day-2025#24

<gb> Issue 24 Accessibility Maturity Model Update (by Helixopp) [session]

Fazio: cannot see breakout session for maturity model

Fazio: issue link shared

Task Force Roadmap

janina: I hope issue is raised in the correct repository, I will check that

Sheri_B-H: I hope timings for TPAC session are managable

Calendar Remaining Calls in 2025

janina: We are not meeting next week on this call

janina: Do you want to meet on 19?

Fazio: No we dont

janina: Are we meeting on 26?

janina: We are not meeting on 26th as well

janina: 3, 10th and 17th and then in 2026

janina: Sheri should get an update on calendar for online mode

Fazio: We have a version 1.0 but we have lot of work to do.

Cleaning editing and making it user friendly

Fazio: we can see some future to track and mark everything in a tool which can be worked on

Sheri_B-H: Can run maturity model on W3C itself?

janina: yes we can bring that up during TPAC

Fazio: all improvements are added on github issue tracker

jkline W3C is unusual to use maturity model

<janina> ~~~q+

someone should own the tool once it is ready to maintain it

https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/report-tool/

Fazio: this should be our benchmark

Fazio: W3C cannot provide a tool to use but this an be a base to start with

<janina> The W3C Accessibility Maturity Model (AMM) provides a framework that offers individuals and organizations of all sizes a roadmap,

janina: Anyone can use it

janina: We are refining the model

janina: We have a long list of unusual organizations but anyone can use it

Fazio: COnversion with Kevin helpful to understand where the confusion lies

Fazio: we have to work on the verbage on the document

AI roadmap

<Fazio> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-maturity/2025Oct/0031.html

Mark_Miller: I created a LM for our minutes only

Mark_Miller: and then prompted for future roadmap for model

Mark_Miller: If anyone wants to join please share gmail ids

Mark_Miller: we can add up github to it so that we can make it more powerful

janina: We should annotate our github issues

Mark_Miller: It allows you to set your dataset

Mark_Miller: Model likes Google data

Mark_Miller: Not sure how we can attach Github

Mark_Miller: We need a way to get github data into LM model

janina: Thisa is very powerful tool

janina: +1 for this tool

jkline we should not get sidetrack and also work on model

janina: We are also in google docs

https://github.com/w3c/tpac2025-breakouts/issues

janina: Messaging for 1.0

janina: guidelines have moved to google docs

janina: We want to see maturity model 1.0

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 248 (Mon Oct 27 20:04:16 2025 UTC).

Diagnostics

Maybe present: sheri

All speakers: Fazio, janina, Mark_Miller, sheri, Sheri_B-H

Active on IRC: Dr_Keith, Fazio, janina, jkline, Mark_Miller, Neha, Sheri_B-H, SusiPallero