Meeting minutes
R6 triage
dbooth: I think #172 (Issues with using FHIR R5 ShEx) can be done after R6, because it does not affect the validity of any FHIR RDF data. It only affects ShEx usability and precision.
AGREED
dbooth: Similarly, I think #177 (OWL polymorphic types + references), #178 (OWL punning issues) and #179 (OWL hierarchy fixes) can be done after R6, because they do not affect the validity of any FHIR RDF data. They only affects OWL usability and precision.
tim: It includes both bug fix and improvement
… already implemented fixes for these.
tim: These changes also implement the fhir:link --> fhir:l
dbooth: Can we approve #177 for inclusion in R6?
dbooth: the fhir:l change needs to be in R6
AGREED: the fhir:l change needs to be in R6
AGREED: Other than the fhir:l change, 177, 178 and 179 could wait until after R6
AGREED: 167 and 168 can be done after R6
dbooth: Also #171 (Add a documentation page for all the IRI prefixes currently on THO) after R6? I think it can be an "informative" addition, rather than normative/authoritative.
jim: There are some hard-coded URIs for LOINC and MeSH, but they don't use the IRI stems in THO
dbooth: I think THO repo can update independently of the FHIR core versioning
ken: Yes, that's the intent.
AGREED: #171 can be after R6
Issue 120: Syntax of added fhir:l links
dbooth: At
w3c/
dbooth: Should we specify the URI syntax in the rdf.html page?
tim: For References, they should be constrained by the Reference types, e.g., for Patient, "Patient" should be in the link.
… But for URIs the literals should just be turned links directly.
dbooth: We'll specify the location of where the fhir:l links go, but what about the syntax of those links?
AGREED: Yes, specify what the syntax SHALL be
dbooth: And that will include the special case for canonical, from pipe to query string,
Scheduling extra calls
dbooth: Nov 1 R6 deadline is rapidly approaching. Should we schedule more FHIR RDF calls? Add Mondays at 11am Boston time?
AGREED: Add Tuesdays 11am Boston time
Issue 120
tim: Might be able to do HAPI changes after R6 deadline
FHIR Ontology
ken: This work on the FHIR ont could be helpful to us, because the FHIR data model has been critical in our ont.
… Would be really helpful to have a powerpoint presentation on it.
… What are the objectives and mission of this work?
ericp: Slides I did for SWAT4LS might be helpful?
ACTION: DBooth to send Ken previous status slides
tim: Also copy me
Yellow schemas
ACTION: Dbooth to create an issue to add Turtle to XML column on datatypes page
AGREED: Add fhir:l to Reference yellow schema
ADJOURNED