Meeting minutes
New Business
Fazio: Email from government worker in Australia and who used the maturity model exactly how we would've wanted it used. Three orgs recently used how it was specified, and who also customized it to their needs. It lets us know that it works.
Fazio: The email did have feedback that is useful and the feedback will be reviewed.
SusiPallero: Got message from Swedish government, exploring how to map similarities to EN, which is already close to ISO, so that W3C maturity model can serve as guidance. They would love to talk about working together.
Fazio: Read out the email...
Fazio: It's feedback for future releases.
CharlesL: Confirmed that what was in the email that was similar to the experience he had when using the model. They're good points for future consideration.
Triage New Github Issues
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 318 Term Proof Point Isn't Clear (by Helixopp) [Editorial] [Substantive]
Fazio: 318 is work Sherri was doing on customizing the model. Sherri's suggested text and the rest of the feedback on that feedback were added to the issue.
<CharlesL> +1 I like it as well
janina: likes the suggested text as well and thinks it should be added.
CharlesL: Asked about a change log for the document
janina: Change log will be formed once its published. Those this can be noted as part of the vendor comments that took place before the next note comes out.
janina: Will be making some additional edits, including more on keeping a list of changes and customizations. Imagines a future where there are standard reports, which would make it very important to have change documented.
Mark_Miller: As we add proof points, it could be added burden for those using the model to address added ones.
@fazio: added edits into the issue
<gb> @fazio
Fazio: making more edits
<CharlesL> In the Appendix add a new section "Change log"Note that this change log only identifies substantive changes since the Public Review (08/28/2025).For a list of all issues addressed, refer to the Maturity Model Task Force's issue tracker.Substantive changes since the Public Review 08/28/2025
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 322 Consider whether to add a proof point to the support section about AI agents. (by jasonjgw)
Fazio: Discussed issue 322. This will be part of future work and be combined with another AI implications issue that Sherri was working on.
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 323 Strengthen motivation for procurement language (by judbrew) [Future work]
Fazio: Discussed issues 323.
janina: Will take on reviewing this issue.
janina: Need to hand over APA by Sept 22 to make TPAC.