W3C

– DRAFT –
Media and Entertainment IG

02 September 2025

Attendees

Present
Bernd_Czelhan, Chris_Needham, Daniel_Silhavy, Hiroki_Endo, Hisayuki_Ohmata, Kaz_Ashimura, Louay_Bassbouss, Nigel_Megitt, Nishitha_B_Dey, Rob_Smith, Tatsuya_Igarashi
Regrets
-
Chair
ChrisN, Igarashi
Scribe
cpn, kaz

Meeting minutes

Agenda

Chris: review of topics and planning for the TPAC meeting
… if you have any suggestions for the agenda, also very welcome

(none)

Chris: Hoping to get your feedback today on agenda for TPAC

Rechartering

Chris: the current Charter expires the end of October this year
… This is an opportunity to think about our next steps and areas of focus
… If you think there's no work to be done, that's also useful feedback to hear, or if we should formulate it in a different way
… The current proposal is to largely continue in the same way as we currently do
… We'll need to make some adjustments to the Charter, to align with the latest Charter template,
… and refresh the list of the related groups
… Those are still to be done
… Regarding timelines, Kaz and I discussed a plan to request a 3-month extension under the current charter
… till 31 Jan 2026
… and aim to produce a draft Charter before TPAC, and start the formal Charter review process following TPAC

Current MEIG Charter

Chris: I welcome your comments on the charter, including by email if you prefer

TPAC 2025 Schedule

Chris: TPAC in Kobe, Japan, 10-14 Nov

TPAC 2025 Schedule page

Next Generation Audio

Chris: There was discussion during the previous TPAC
… but no concrete conclusion yet.
… Some feedback last time was to work on gap analysis.
… Should we organise discussion during TPAC 2025 also?

Bernd: We should present the gap analysis
… It maybe does not need a long time slot,
… but would be good to have some progress
… Wolfgang has a document that could be presented

Chris: Agree it's a good thing to include
… My colleague, Matt (who is a co-chair of Audio WG), is reviewing

Media Format Support on the Web

Chris: There was an AV Media Formats for Browser CG meeting at TPAC 2023
… Dolby emphasizes need for Media Capabilities support for their codecs
… At Media Web Symposium this year, I had some discussion about the pain points of LC-EVC in browsers as well
… What would be interesting to be supported for browsers?
… Recent discussion in Chromium on HEVC support in WebRTC, HEVC support in MediaRecorder, Audio/Video documentation
… Licensing implications and implementations for hardware support
… I think there may be a useful discussion about this to be had,
… to think about media formats more generally than NGA, which is one example

Rob: One the subject of media format support,
… OGC testbed is using HEIF, high efficiency images
… which has some integration with the browsers but not all

<cpn> Chris: https://caniuse.com/?search=heif

Chris: I did a quick check on caniuse... it seems to be supported by Safari, but nothing else.

Rob: Yes
… AUIU, there's HEIF and HEIC, one has royalty-free and another doesn't

Chris: I recall discussion on JPEG-XL, but not the detail.
… Browser makers also have their own preferences for image formats.
… WebP is more widely supported.

Rob: Will continue to work with the OGC group

Chris: tx

Text Tracks in MSE

Chris: Timed Text in MSE was a topic at TPAC 2024, and more recently Alicia's implementation work in WebKt.
… Do we want to use this TPAC for this topic?
… (shows MSE Issue 358)

media-source Issue #38 - Support timed text in MSE

Nigel: MSE could take advantage of common approach for Audio, Video, Captions.
… Presentation is different as we're not strongly expecting browsers to support and present the different formats and captions.
… What priority is it for people? I'd love to do this, but there isn't necesarily a strong push that we need it. There are solutions people use today that work.
… Focus on what problem we're solving and why, to help people udnesrtand why people should spend time on it.

Chris: If we think it's good time to discuss this, I'm happy to facilitate.
… We can present all the rationale.

Nigel: What could be useful this time is getting an assessment of what the level of appetite is, in the next calendar year.
… Do people want to spend time on it?

Chris: We know there are two organizations interested, Netflix and BBC

Nigel: There could be more
… how many organizations to be considered?

Chris: This is a question for all the things we might propose within the IG
… Potentially a new feature, showing interest from content provider type of users
… One question is creating a case for investment for implementations
… But then where the effort comes from? Does the interest come with contribution of effort to implementations?
… part of this question is also whether people willing to use time for this or not

Nigel: MEIG can assess the maturity of the proposal, and whether incubation development is needed, it can't work on implementations

Chris: As an IG we can only point to requirements
… The second part of this, and a key thing Nigel said, is that we're not asking for browser support for all possible formats,
… instead a way for the content to be delivered to the web app for rendering.
… The overall model we need to think about, relates to TextTrackCue, VTTCue and DataCue APIs

MSE and EME on CE devices

Chris: We had previous discussion in Mar, Feb, Jan 2025 and Dec 2024 meetings.
… The recent WAVE liaison to Media WG raises EME issues, features, interoperability concerns, and testing. I believe Media WG includes the features in scope already, e.g., transitioning from unencrypted to encrypted content.
… This is an interesting topic to dig into.
… The WG can pick up in terms of potential features,
… and practical concerns using the API from people at WAVE and SVTA.
… WAVE mentions some interesting work on test suites.
… Very interested to talk about that.
… Should we include in the TPAC agenda?
… F2F meeting would be a good opportunity

Daniel: We had an SVTA players group meeting
… also GitHub discussion
… about EME similar to the MSE discussion
… We're gathering issues that we can present at a later date

Chris: Great

Louay: Regarding WAVE, there are survey responses we could talk about at TPAC,
… and updates on the recent activities regarding testing.
… I'm happy to contribute.

Chris: Thanks. Would we prefer to bring both SVTA and WAVE together to discuss with W3C?

Daniel: My preference is handling them at once

Louay: I agree.
… The question is holding the discussion during TPAC or during the monthly call?

Chris: I agree to gather people at once, but we could possibly talk about the testing aspects at TPAC
… and ask people to agree to a follow on meeting for the interoperability discussion.

Louay: Yeah, from the testing perspective, I can make a presentation
… Advertising during the bigger meeting also,
… TPAC would be a good timing.

Chris: So either way would work,
… we can can arrange multiple sessions in the future
… It will be good to move the MSE topic forward too

media-source Issue 359 - Dynamic addition/removal of SourceBuffers

Daniel: Thasso was leading on this, suggest contacting him.

Chris: Happy to do that, thanks.
… One of the responses we sometimes hear regards potential workarounds, so need to show why these don't work as well in a CE device context.

media-source Issue 357 - Proposal: Have a detachable MediaSource object

Accessibility

Chris: We have a joint meeting with the APA WG scheduled, together with TTWG
… Topics during the previous meeting included symbolics in media chapter titles, MAUR updates, haptics tracks
… This is often a valuable meeting. I'll contact the APA WG chairs to plan the agenda.
… Is there anything new we want to raise from a media perspective?

Nigel: Things have changed for accessibility in media due to European Accessibility Act.
… Previously, US FCC, Canada, Australia.
… EU Accessibility Act comes into force in June.
… There's work in ETSI and CENELC to update EN 301 549, which will be referenced by EU as a way to meet the EAA requirements.
… Large sections of the document reference WCAG 2.2.
… Mostly that's fine, except one part is off track: audio description, where the normative requirement appears to be to have an additional AD track avaiable.
… Informative text says that isn't true, e.g., if audio related to a video already has enough info then there's no need for an additional track. The goal is perceivability of the content, but you wouldn't know that just from reading the doc.

Chris: I guess the EAA has been discussed in W3C already?

Nigel: There are media requirements to be updated

Chris: So our focus would be on media moreso than general Web accessibility

Kaz: I wanted to mention the MAUR should be the focus from MEIG

Nigel: Some requirements are in WCAG and some are in MAUR. That may be OK, or does it need refactoring?

Kaz: Good question, which part to be handled by us, MEIG?

Immersive Streaming Media

Chris: This came up during Media WG charter review, a comment from someone involved in Metaverse Standards Forum, and opportunity to collaborate on interactivity and streaming media.
… I don't see this necessarily to be handled during TPAC
… A collaboration with the Metaverse Standards Forum on issues related to interactive/streaming 3D media, focusing on streaming media, could be something for us.
… It reminded me year ago Apple made a presentation to Media WG on web requirements coming from their VisionOS platform
… e.g., stereoscopic video, motion safety, display capability detection, and caption depth
… Not a TPAC discussion, but possibly follow-up with the MSF if there is interest I could facilitate this

Louay: I presented on this at Media Web Symposium
… Those updates from Apple's perspective are relevant to cloud game streaming. We're interested in this.

Louay: It's not only Apple with Vision OS, there's Android XR and Meta Horizon OS. Interoperability is needed, to provide immersive media on those platforms.

Chris: Right

Rob: I'm also active in MSF, for GeoPose. I can ask there about this aspect.

DataCue

Rob: I'd like to request we schedule a couple of WICG DataCue meetings during Sept and Oct, aheaed of TPAC.

Chris: Happy to do that, let's figure out when to have the discussion

Rob: OK

Media Content Metadata

Chris: We got a good report from the MCM-JP CG during the August meeting
… They're making good progress on use cases and industry requirements
… TPAC plan is short update in MEIG meeting
… and a breakout including demo

Endo: Just a quick update, we're planning to have our breakout on the Tuesday morning

Chris: ok, tx!

Endo: we'll introduce our work during the MEIG meeting on Monday
… then people can visit our breakout on Tuesday

Chris: Great, thank you very much

Sync on the Web

Chris: We had an update from Komatsu-san during the MEIG call in July
… He's planning to present at the developer community meetup that is being planned for the Sunday before TPAC
… Not sure if he wants time in MEIG too, I'll ask

Media Protocols

Chris: Media over QUIC at IETF, also SCONE.
… I may follow up with Dan Druta on updates on those
… There's also CMCD and CMSD from WAVE, could ask Will

HDR Colour Support on the Web

Chris: PNG 3rd edition adds support for HDR
… There's progress in CSS (see issues labeled as "css-color-hdr") but I haven't been following closely
… I wonder if it's worthwhile to hold a review of latest progress?
… The last CG meeting was in July 2024

AOB

Chris: If you have any other specific topic in mind, please let me know
… Any final comments?

(none)

[adjourned]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 196 (Thu Oct 27 17:06:44 2022 UTC).