Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
matatk: A few announcements!
matatk: We have been successfully rechartered. There will be much rejoicing.
matatk: We have a lot of plans for impoving the horizontal review process starting to take shape.
matatk: There is maturing not only in Maturity Model but also elsewhere.
matatk: We're keeping an eye sout for the IEs remainging IEs. We should be able to carry on as normal, but there si always the risk of blips at these transition points. Fair warning.
matatk: Hopefully nothing bad will happen. *Famosu last words.)
matatk: On the 20th of August there will be a talk form Lola A
Odelola on this call. The talk will be really good. Do attend if possible.
matatk: FYI: We've always had the confusion between the repos for spec review requests (a11y-request) and the dashboard repo we use to track discussions and track things we want to send back to a spec (a11y-review). There is now a new arrangement.
matatk: a11y-review willbe renamed on Friday to a11y-tracking to track more with the tracking nature of the tracking repo itself. Neat trick.
Fazio: The MM track note is pretty much done. There are a few touchups we want to do before it's out. At the latest, September is go time.
matatk: The maturity maties have indeed been models of maturity maturation.
matatk: Watch this psace for the CFC to be.
janina: We expect to publish another wide review draft beore the CFC. We will ask for a WR to make sure that we haven't missed anythign that should be done right before we say it's really, really done.
janina: Sequence: Wide Review publiscation. Asking for everyone to read it and feedback. Then we will come back to APA and say we think we're done and do a CFC to publish as an APA note.
Fazio: There is a lot of work to be done after the M is out. There will be tooling, other documents and so on.
TPAC 2025
matatk: Reminder that the registration for TPAC is open.
matatk: The applications for the support funds is also open.
matatk: That support fund is for the IEs.
matatk: WE have one pending schedule change request and one that came in today which we will try our darndest to accommodate.
New charters
Roy_Ruoxi: Nothing new here.
New on TR
IMSC Text Profile 1.3
<Roy_Ruoxi> - tracker: https://
<Roy_Ruoxi> - spec: https://
Roy_Ruoxi: Two docuemnts.
Roy_Ruoxi: The first from TTWG. Spec defining text only profile of TTML2 intended for the subtitle and caption delivery.
matatk: Let's discuss this in the spec review section.
CSS Borders and Box Decorations Module Level 4
<Roy_Ruoxi> - tracker: https://
<Roy_Ruoxi> - spec: https://
Roy_Ruoxi: A new publication from CSSWG.
matatk: For this particular one, this is about fatures of CSS relating to borders and decorations of boxes. Whcih has something or other to do woith the name, you'd say.
matatk: There is no a11y considrations section, which may or may not be a big thing since it may be handled by parents.
matatk: Thre's changes, of course.
<matatk> Changes: https://
matatk: Not much here that may be a11y breaking.
matatk: We'll keep tabs on this one for future work.
Spec review requests
matatk: Please the IMSC text profiles again, Roy.
IMSC Text Profile 1.3
<Roy_Ruoxi> - tracker: https://
<Roy_Ruoxi> - spec: https://
matatk: This one, they have made a very nice review request. The direct link that Neha gave works very well as well.
matatk: As Roy said, this is about subtitles for videos. We looked at this some time back.
matatk: They have told us what has changed since last time, so that we can find out if ther is something a11y-related that has changed.
<matatk> Issue in relation to the removal of the Image Profile: w3c/
matatk: Specially of note that there is a specific reference to MAUR.
CSS UI 4
janina and Neh will look in the there it isdocument for review
<matatk> CSS UI 4: w3c/
matatk: assigning this to Paul and someone to give a hand to him
Dr. Keith: I will volunteer
matatk: I will also point you to Horizontal review process document
Comment review requests
Connect HTML spec up to new CSS interactivity property
<matatk> w3c/
matatk: we had more discussion on internal thread, now we are happy with it. Thanks to Jennifer and Paul to discuss and check that
[css-anchor-position-1] Improve accessibility guidance
<matatk> w3c/
matatk: Neha has added one example and Paul has added a review
matatk: tooltip and disclosure are two examples which requires to be added to this exmaple now
Neha: Need to check if mentioend exmaple is violating any SC