Meeting minutes
Issue 120
dbooth: Should we generalize the generation of a fhir:link everywhere the value is of type xsd:anyURI ?
ACTION: EricP to look at what other properties are affected by this
FHIR RDF questions
detlef: Confused by seeing fhir:name.family in one place but fhir:family in another place. Which is it?
ericP: Originally we used fully qualified property names, because FHIR originally did not enforce consistent property naming. But that's now changed in v5, to shorter property names.
ericP: I think you could us HAPI to convert R4 to R5 FHIR RDF.
dbooth: Should we try to provide something to convert R4 to R5?
ericP: You would have to pull in a POJO for each type you want to handle.
detlef: I have R4 data, but need to also now use R5.
… I'll try writing the R4 data as JSON and see if I can read it as R5.
Next meeting
detlef out July 24 - Aug 14. Back Aug 21
EricP at risk Aug 3 - 30.
ADJOURNED