<Helen> Chair+
scribe+
Helen - not much, planned meetings
Helen - Spare time is not easy to find, so we've explored more working sessions
Sasha - Doing reviews, reviewed Wilco's PR to replace page for filtering, organizational restrictions caused some issue, but fixed now
Sage - Not much, too busy with paid work
Carlos - Just attending meetings
Adithya - First call, just joined W3C recently and still feeling out everything
Carlos - let's do introductions as Adithya's first call is today
Everyone introduces themselves
Helen - Reviewers wanted filter - rule 2301
Helen - Sage and I need to review this, Adithya may need to be added to the repo to contribute
<sashanichols> I've reviewed so many PRs lately I would prefer to do actual work now :D
Confirmed Adithya needs to be added or invited to do reviews
Carlos - Reiterates we can only count one review per organization, but that doesn't mean there's no value in multiple people from one org reviewing
Helen - We have all bugs with no labels
Helen - issue 1299 - can we skip because Carlos has answered?
Helen - As it was answered by Carlos in 2020 and the person hasn't responded, can we close it?
Helen - Issue closed with note
Helen - issue 1446 - from September 2020 jym77
Helen - Opens related pull 1661
Carlos - Doesn't believe they got to a point with an acceptable definition, couldn't get test examples because we can't get a livestream running 24/7 that would work with W3C requirements
Carlos - We looked into traffic and nature cams, but found no guarantee that they would never be taken offline, terms and conditions issues caused issues as well
Helen - Can we get the tester to identify their own example for the livestream?
Carlos - May want to open an issue for that
Helen - Adding a comment to explain issue with livestream examples to issue 1446
Helen - Adding label Rule Update
Helen - Looking at issue 1458
Helen - Reviewing thread, there's a draft on a PR, and this is a Rule Update item
Helen - Adding label Rule Update
Helen - Issue 1502
Helen - Reviews thread
Carlos - This will be closed with PR 1655 completion
Helen - Adds Rule Update label
Helen - Issue 1517 - Reviewing thread
Helen - Currently assigned to someone who is no longer part of group, though he said we could close the issue
Helen - Linked to a closed PR 1548
Helen - Looks like the issue became obsolete or otherwise a non-issue
Helen - Closed issue with comment
Helen - Issue 1542 - Wilco's thoughts
Helen - Issue is about automating, and is that taken care of with the new changes Wilco implemented?
Helen - Closed issue with comment, and Wilco can reopen if needed
Helen - Issue 1545 - Is this the same as one we mentioned earlier this meeting?
Carlos - That issue mentioned it would be opening a new issue, this must be that. It's a draft
Carlos - No one has worked on this
Helen - Notes a conversation with original poster where it was confirmed they won't be able to work on it for some time. Should we close it?
Carlos - Does this have the Help Wanted label? No
Helen - Adds Help Wanted label
Added rule update label as well
Helen - One last issue - Issue 1579, which is rejected
Helen - Related PR - 1802, which is closed
Helen - Close this because the PR is closed?
Helen - closed with comment
Helen - Just kidding one more - Issue 1588
Helen - Reviewing thread, "repeated items" is subjective because it's not classified very well
Carlos - Situation Kathy raised was handled in the composite rule
Helen - And that was closed
Helen - closed with comment
Carlos - If Kathy wants, she can reopen it
Carlos - Adithya has been added and that is taken care of
Helen - thoughts on today's session?
Adithya - Interesting that we're focusing on a lot of things and in addition to own organization's work
Adithya - The call helped understand many things moving forward
Sasha - Was wondering because we had to spend almost all meeting time today going through issues, can we do it differently so that it takes less time?
Carlos - We did this sort of thing once every 6 months or year to see what we could do with issues that built up
Carlos - Adithya, hopefully this was a good introduction to you, because we sometimes go into deeper technical discussions. This was different from our usual meetings
Carlos - Because we don't have items with agenda tags, this felt like a good opportunity to take the time to do this
Helen - We're trying to understand how to get productivity going knowing everyone has limited bandwidth
Helen - We have two weeks to come up with an idea for how to do this
Carlos - next week is office hours
This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Default Present: sashanichols, Helen, Sage, CarlosD_, Adithya Present: sashanichols, Helen, Sage, CarlosD_, Adithya No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Sage Inferring Scribes: Sage WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]