Meeting minutes
Administratrivia
<Lionel_Wolberger> janina: Rechartering is on track, no action needed here
<Lionel_Wolberger> Lionel_Wolberger: TPAC planning?
<Lionel_Wolberger> janina: We need TPAC to resolve the open Ruby issues
<Lionel_Wolberger> ... currently Ruby's default is to display, and if Symbols uses Ruby we do not want it displayed
<matatk> Issue Jeffrey proposed re <ruby>: w3c/
<matatk> (Our issue we filed to request the TPAC meeting is separate to that.)
<gb> Issue 234 Add a way to indicate the semantics of ruby annotations (by w3cbot) [tracker] [s:html-ruby-extensions]
matatk: TPAC, we have requested APA, WHAT-WG and I18N
… nothing to stop us from resolving it prior to TPAC
Symbols Status and Next Steps
Lionel_Wolberger: The ruby rendering issue above is the remaining item to resolve, w3c/
janina: Clarify the explainer
Annalu: I have an open action item, to add Use Cases
<matatk> Re Symbols, issues that may be relevant: https://
matatk: Suggest we review the open issues
<matatk> WAI-Adapt Task Force Meeting Minutes: https://
<matatk> Re the symbols issue we are tracking down (IDs section in registry): https://
Lionel_Wolberger: The registry at https://
… has a section defining the ID. "A fixed integer numeric value denotes an index reference by which the following two other elements may be reliably cross-referenced. This is the BCI index value."
<Annalu> Annalu's github handle:
<Annalu> annaluwaller
W3C form to associate github identity to W3C account: https://
<matatk> Gap Analysis Wiki page: https://
Lionel_Wolberger: (We continue to close and comment on the issues)
Lionel_Wolberger: Looking at w3c/
<gb> Issue 203 Unclear how the Bliss symbol examples should work with l10n/i18n. (by cookiecrook) [Personalization] [Symbols]
Lionel_Wolberger: Done with issue review
Explainer
matatk: I suggest we work asynchronously on list to begin the rewrite