Meeting minutes
TPAC
Lionel_Wolberger: WHAT-WG, the chances that we will request an attribute are sharply reduced
matatk: The i18n issue needs to be faced; three way meeting Adapt, I18N and WHAT-WG
Lionel_Wolberger: We have many hallway or breakout conversations that we want, regarding our projected use of existing HTML
… what about AGWG?
matatk: If Well Known Destinations is sufficiently matured, it is cogent to alert WCAG that this might be a relevant 'how to meet' or best practice
… WCAG 3.0 is far enough in future that it is worth alerting AGWG, along with Symbols
… as things AGWG should be aware
Lionel_Wolberger: Let's request an AGWG agenda item to present, 15m or 30m
Well Known Destinations
<matatk> PR: w3c/
<gb> Pull Request 279 Update well-known destinations explainer in accordance with TPAC 2024 (by matatk)
<matatk> w3c/
<gb> Issue 296 Well Known Destinations Localization (by lwolberg)
Lionel_Wolberger: Discussion recorded in the issue
… Issue closed
… taking up w3c/
<gb> Action 288 Add list of proposed rel values to explainer (on matatk)
<matatk> https://
matatk: The above link takes you to this link https://
… which has the original COGA list
… The quorum today agrees these WKDs are on the list: accessibility statement, contact, help, home, sign-in
… others were cited as deserving discussion
matatk: Let's file an issue for each one as a proposed destination and take them up one at a time
Abhinav: Can we introduce new ideas to this list? We should specify the process for this
matatk: +1
Lionel_Wolberger: +1
matatk: We need to specify how we handle 'nesting' or sub-sites
matatk: I will load the issues