– DRAFT –
FHIR RDF

DICOM Sequence Tags (SQ) handling #146

w3c/hcls-fhir-rdf#146

erich: Media fragments: https://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/

detlef: Multiparts: https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/chtml/part18/sect_8.7.3.5.html

dbooth: The JSON and XML dicom media types explicitly do not define fragment semantics. Therefore anything goes, and we could also propose to the DICOM folks to add fragment semantics to a future version of the mime type specs. https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/dicom+json

https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/dicom+xml

erich: RDF for describing media types: https://www.w3.org/ns/iana/media-types/text/html#Resource
… But folks in the SOLID group want to add superclasses to these mime types

erich: https://www.w3.org/ns/iana/media-types/image/jpeg#Resource

erich: https://www.w3.org/ns/assignments/reg#

dbooth: In summary, we think we're on the right track.

ACTION: Erich to add a comment to the issue, describing the proposed solution for the application/dicom media type to define syntax and semantics of the fragment

ADJOURNED

detlef: Out next week