Meeting minutes
Discussion on the open issues and PR of rdf-semantics
<niklasl> Triple term triple unification is merged?
<niklasl> Yes.
<niklasl> (We may need to adapt other formulations.)
<niklasl> w3c/
<gb> Issue 61 Explain how classic RDF reification relates to triple terms and rdf:reifies (by niklasl) [spec:editorial]
<niklasl> You really _should not_ use these rdfreserved:tt* terms though...
<niklasl> (archaic; also used in vann:)
<AndyS> https://
<AndyS> The mentioned issue 10: https://
<niklasl> +1 the "classic" terms are an encoding; non-semantic preserving, etc.
<niklasl> AFAICS, this is to be reopened now: w3c/
<gb> CLOSED Pull Request 31 add rdf:dirLangString, rdf:reifies, rdf:Proposition, and modify rdf:JSON (by domel) [spec:substantive]
ACTION: delete reification subsection from appendix D odf semantics spec
ACTION: enrico to remove reference to completeness of RDFS entailment rule for rdfs:proposition
<gb> Cannot create action. Validation failed. Maybe remove reference is not a valid user for w3c/rdf-star-wg?
ACTION: Add reference to appendix d on reification of 1.1 semantics spec in section 8 of concepts spec
<gb> Cannot create action. Validation failed. Maybe Add reference is not a valid user for w3c/rdf-star-wg?
<enrico> (refer to it as archaic)
ACTION: Create not on triple term owlification (Niklas)