Meeting minutes
GitHub issues
issue #41
looking at OVON Dialog Events specification
dirk: why not look at EMMA JSON?
debbie: Dialog Events assume most communication is based on natural language
… maybe we should compare EMMA JSON and Dialog Events
… we could talk about that on January 15
… no call January 1
issue # 44
dirk: error handling
review section 4, "Error Handling"
we decide to close issue #44
moving on to issue #45
dirk: still working on this
#46 is still open
#48 so far we haven't gotten a reply on this, could ask Kazuyuki
#50
debbie will look at UserML
for user settings
dirk: updating interfaces document with changes to architecture
… still working on this
this is issue number 51
dirk: introduce an "example" section
#52 improve description of GenAI
agree to close #52
compatibility of licenses for reference implementation
kaz: start with Phillipe LeHegaret
dirk: these are libraries used in our reference implementation
debbie: or we could say that this is an implementation by a member of our group, so not an official W3C implementation
kaz: similar to the Web of Things situation
possible Speech Web workshop
kaz: user-friendly smart agents on the web
… need to update descriptions, focus on use cases, requirements, update with changes to technology
<kaz> w3c/
kaz: need to form a Program Committee to work on topics
… will update the issue on GitHub
… workshop is expected in 2025
… user-friendly smart agent would be useful for smart cities
… web of things
debbie: can you recommend some people from Web of Things
<kaz> Michael Koster, Sebastian Kaebisch, Michael McCool, Ege Korkan, etc.
kaz: requirements, use cases and pain points should be clarified
dirk: should identify some commonalities that tie all these audiences together
kaz: need to find important stakeholders from different industries
dirk: has colleague in smart cities domain
debbie: also smart cars
debbie: form provisional program committee and have a call would be the next step
kaz: will add comments to GitHub
… early next year
kaz: timeline depends on physical meeting or remote
… only a few months if remote
… or 6 months if in-person
… translation and transcription services, everyone needs to provide a video
… people should provide a brief statement, slides and video
debbie: would be in favor of remote meeting
debbie: next call is January 15
… but we don't need a call to start thinking of program committee members
kaz: usually 10 people is a good number for a Program Committee
… could have different meetings for different time zones