W3C

– DRAFT –
Maturity Model Task Force

11 December 2024

Attendees

Present
CharlesL, Dr_Keith, Fazio, janina, JKLINE, Mark_Miller, NehaJ, stacey
Regrets
-
Chair
David Fazio
Scribe
NehaJ

Meeting minutes

<Fazio> Update on Github Issue #148 Resolution

<gb> /issues/148 -> #148

<gb> /issues/226 -> #226

<gb> /issues/230 -> #230

<gb> /issues/231 -> #231

<gb> /issues/126 -> #126

<gb> /issues/226 -> #226

<gb> /issues/230 -> #230

<gb> /issues/126 -> #126

<gb> /issues/231 -> #231

Messaging update with Janina

janina: We can meet next week and then 2 weeks off

Fazio: we will meet on 8th Jan 2025

Determine if the proof points in the MM document and the assessment tool should be synced #228

<gb> /issues/228 -> #228

<Fazio> w3c/maturity-model#228

<gb> Issue 228 Determine if the proof points in the MM document and the assessment tool should be synced (by jeffkline)

Charles: We had mutiple columns for status and justification, problem was with lot of scrolling, conflict issue in some cases.

CharlesL: Another model had only one column for status and one cloumn for justification

CharlesL: Dmoed new format of excel sheet with one column for status and another for justification. Status Level column with dropdown menu

Demo*

<Fazio> +1 looks more user friendly

stacey: excited for the change but will have to look for colour contrast check

Dr_Keith: great work on new format but can you add proper new headings for total count

CharlesL: will do that

jkline: we need to update the instruction tab

CharlesL: yes noted

jkline: people are confused but this will help to put correct value

Mark_Miller: +1 on improvement

Mark_Miller: I can look to separate formula and names

jkline: Why would we want to change the levels ?

Fazio: people who are non native english speakers, it is friendly for them

Use Cases update with Stacey and Jennifer

stacey: working with Sheri on use cases

Update on Github Issue #226 Resolution

<gb> /issues/226 -> #226

Fazio: as per issue - needs explaination on goals and matrics

explanation*

janina: we can add a note explaining it

Fazio: I will look this with Sheri

Fazio: guidence will be similar for all dimension or not?

janina: it will be some what differernt

stacey: I had added a comment

Fazio: we will add editor's notes

Github Issue #230 Proof Points Communication Tab (Excel) Duplication

<gb> /issues/230 -> #230

<Fazio> w3c/maturity-model#230

<gb> Issue 230 Proof Points Communication Tab (Excel) Duplication (by clapierre)

<gb> /issues/126 -> #126

<gb> /issues/231 -> #231

CharlesL: Deleting duplicate row

Messaging update with Janina -- taken up

janina: need to move word doc to markdown?

janina: it needs to be reviewed by Shaun

Github Issue #231 Excel Workbook - Duplicate Proofpoint

<Fazio> w3c/maturity-model#231

<gb> Issue 231 Excel Workbook - Duplicate Proofpoint (by clapierre)

Jeff wants to know about syncing

Github Issue #126 Update / NEWEST DLC Spreadsheet - Step 2

jkline: should we match proof points from document and from spreadsheet?

Dr_Keith: I tihnk we can try to but not necessary

Fazio: it should be ideal to match but should not stop from publishing

janina: at this point we do not have match exactly

janina: spreadsheet is a parallel work

jkline: adding from spreadsheet to document?

Dr_Keith: it should be other way round

Fazio: proof points are examples and are not requirements, so do we sync or not?

Fazio: we can make a list of proof points which are in spreadsheet

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by scribe.perl version 240 (Tue Dec 10 03:59:59 2024 UTC).

Diagnostics

Maybe present: Charles

All speakers: Charles, CharlesL, Dr_Keith, Fazio, janina, jkline, Mark_Miller, stacey

Active on IRC: CharlesL, Dr_Keith, Fazio, janina, jkline, JKLINE, Mark_Miller, NehaJ, stacey