Meeting minutes
ACTION: addison: complain to plh about the new IRC tool
<gb> Created action #100
Agenda Review
Action Items
<addison> #99
<gb> Action 99 ping unicode about emphasis skip property (see our #530) (on aphillips) due 2024-05-28
<addison> #98
<gb> Action 98 fix code points examples in lang-bidi-use-cases (on r12a) due 2024-05-23
<addison> #93
<gb> Action 93 create best practices for consumers in string-meta (on aphillips) due 2024-04-25
<addison> #90
<gb> Action 90 steal some of henri's text from scroll-to-text-fragment for string-search (on aphillips) due 2024-04-18
<addison> #89
<gb> Action 89 update i18n specs to support dark mode (on xfq) due 2024-04-18
<addison> #87
<gb> Action 87 write to IETF ADs about RFC9457 with JcK's assistance (on aphillips) due 2024-04-04
<addison> #79
<gb> Action 79 schedule a follow-up call with WHATNOT in ~April (on aphillips) due 2024-03-07
<addison> #78
<gb> Action 78 compare infra to i18n-glossary export list and report back (on aphillips) due 2024-03-07
<addison> #43
<gb> Action 43 pull together the list of win/mac/etc apis for setting base direction and/or language (on aphillips) due 2023-09-18
<addison> #33
<gb> Action 33 Close issues marked `close?` or bring to WG for further review (on aphillips)
<addison> #8
<gb> Action 8 Follow up on the status of Canvas and formatted text (on aphillips) due 18 Jul 2023
<addison> #7
<gb> Action 7 Remind shepherds to tend to their awaiting comment resolutions (Evergreen) (on aphillips, xfq, himorin, r12a, bert-github) due 18 Jul 2023
Info Share
JcK: BCP 47 is under control. It was inconsistent, but IANA now working on it.
RADAR Review
<addison> https://
addison: One new incoming request, HTML Ruby extensions. Who can review?
xfq: I can. Maybe Richard, too?
Pending Issue Review
string-meta explainer
<addison> https://
addison: Richard had a bunch of comments, but he is not here today.
… I usedmy own graphic for the example with ‘covid-19’.
xfq: You removed the footnotes?
addison: Yes, they became links in the text.
atsushi: the last char in Japanese & Chinese example looks unusual for Japanese.
<xfq> https://
addison: Is there a similar char to use instead?
atsushi: Need to think about it...
addison: So we should probably nudge Richard to look at the examples.
<xfq> in my system they are rendered using "Hiragino Kaku Gothic ProN" and "PingFang TC" fonts, and their glyphs are different
<addison> (characters is U+5794 垔)
addison: I'll nudge Richard.
needs-attention issue review
<addison> https://
<addison> i18n-activity#8
<gb> Issue 8 i18n-ISSUE-429: "valid" language tag (by r12a) [s:webvtt] [close?] [tracker] [needs-attention] [wg:timed-text] [cg:texttracks]
addison: As part of my reviewing issues labeled with ‘close?’.
… I don't think WebVTT is going to change. I propose we close the issue.
<atsushi> +1 to close
<xfq> https://
<addison> https://
atsushi: Still in CR
<xfq> https://
addison: Our comment is to be clearer about what ‘valid’ means. Otherwise nothing wrong about that note.
xfq: It is a requirement for the *author*, isn't it?
addison: They say implementations do not need to check.
… I think we're OK with saying that the tag must be ‘valid’
<addison> i18n-activity#46
<gb> Issue 46 i18n-ISSUE-391: Quotation Marks are Different in Other Languages (by r12a) [s:dpub-pagination] [needs-attention] [needs-resolution] [t:typ_misc] [ig:publishing]
addison: The repo for dpub-pagination is gone. Maybe part of dpub now?
xfq: Give me an action to find out the history and see if we can do anything.
ACTION: xfq: research what if anything to do with dpub-pagination comments and old DPIG comments
<gb> Created action #101
xfq: This one is about our latin layout requirements document.
… Keep the issue open for now.
<addison> i18n-activity#78
<gb> Issue 78 i18n-ISSUE-464: 'label' needs direction and language metadata (by r12a) [close?] [s:mediacapture-streams] [needs-attention] [needs-resolution] [t:bidi_strings] [t:lang_strings] [wg:webrtc]
<addison> mediacapture-main#665
<gb> Issue 665 'label' needs direction and language metadata (by xfq) [i18n-needs-resolution]
addison: We said last year we were not satisfied. Their issue is still open.
xfq: They asked for real situations.
addison: I'm limited by the devices I have when I need to make examples.
xfq: Makes sense to remove the needs-attention and close? labels.
<addison> i18n-activity#590
<gb> Issue 590 advance is measured as distance up to left side of character #3994 (by r12a) [tracker] [s:html] [needs-attention] [whatwg]
addison: Issue is still open. Does not need the needs-attention label?
<addison> i18n-activity#758
<gb> Issue 758 The lang attribute and user input (by himorin) [tracker] [s:html] [needs-attention] [whatwg]
addison: My last comment from Sep 2019 is that this may be equivalent to dirname attribute. Leave it alone?
<addison> i18n-activity#1026
<gb> Issue 1026 Add hyphenation-hint as HTML-element (by w3cbot) [tracker] [s:html] [needs-attention] [i:hyphenation] [whatwg]
<addison> i18n-activity#1376
<gb> Issue 1376 multiple natural language text fields share language/direction [I18N] (by w3cbot) [close?] [s:appmanifest] [needs-attention] [needs-resolution] [t:lang_negotiation] [wg:webapps]
addison: Parent issue is closed, but they have done work on it since.
… Anyone knows the status?
xfq: I think there is another issue about this, but I don't know which.
<xfq> w3c/
<gb> Issue 1045 Web Manifest Overrides (by marcoscaceres) [i18n-tracker] [TPAC2023]
addison: The document in TR still has the problem.
xfq: This ^^ is a tracker issue, but maybe it's this one.
addison: I'll comment in their 968 asking if 1045 is the one tracking it.
… I'll remove ‘needs-attention’ and cite 1045.
xfq: Also add needs-resolution to 1045?
addison: Yes
<addison> i18n-activity#1620
<gb> Issue 1620 [focusgroup] i18n: should arrow key navigation follow text direction? (by w3cbot) [close?] [tracker] [needs-attention] [s:open-ui] [cg:open-ui]
addison: Question is if arrow key navigation follows text direction.
… It is more complex than the summary.
… Should we ping alreq and have bidi people review it?
xfq: Yes, probably.
ACTION: addison: ping alreq group to review our i18n-activity#1620
<gb> Created action #102
<addison> i18n-activity#1758
<gb> Issue 1758 Reference for punycode-encoding of IDN (by w3cbot) [needs-attention] [needs-resolution] [s:rdf-concepts] [wg:rdf-star]
addison: You worked on this, Fuqiao?
xfq: Yes, I commented on it. And on specdev.
addison: I'll remove the needs-attention label.