Meeting minutes
<matatk> gb, off
<gb> matatk, issues and names were already off.
Agenda Review & Announcements
TPAC 2024 Planning
matatk: Looking for suggestions of other groups with whom we should meet
matatk: think we've got 5 or 6 other groups (WHATWG, media groups, publishing, CSS, etc.)
<matatk> TPAC 2023 meetings, for reference: https://
<Gottfried> maybe virtually from Wed-Fri
<Fredrik> +1
<Fazio> +1
<Fazio> in person
matatk: How many are thinking to be part of TPAC this year, virtual or in person
<NehaJ> +1 virtual
<janina> +1 in person
<Fredrik> +1 virtual, I mean...
<Nichole> +1 vitual
+1 virtual
<Fazio> +1 in person
<Roy> +1 in person
New Charters Review https://github.com/w3c/strategy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Horizontal+review+requested%22
Roy: Nothing new this week
HR A11y Review Comment Tracker https://w3c.github.io/horizontal-issue-tracker/?repo=w3c/a11y-review
CSS View Transitions
<matatk> w3c/
matatk: [recaps last week's conversation about users being able to disable view transitions]
matatk: Added label to see a resolution to this issue.
No-motion / forced-reduced-motion issue draft
<matatk> our tracking issue: w3c/
matatk: if anyone wants to look at the issue and respond either in GitHub or on list it would be appreciated
Interaction side?
<matatk> Our tracking link: w3c/
<janina> +1 to facilitating putting those in a preferred location!
matatk: [recaps interaction side discussion: media query to express which side users prefer content to appear]
Fazio: cognitively this is a good idea
janina: would like the preference to choose where this content appears
Fredrik: interesting cultural issue regarding reading right to left
matatk: Reading the first comment in the thread to determine if it satisfies this concern would be welcome
Explicit Review Requests https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues
matatk: As Roy said, nothing new. We do have one pending—The Ethical Work Prinicples from the TAG
Ethical Web Principles (TAG)
<matatk> w3c/
matatk: [summarizes thread: very high level principles as to ethics on the web]
Dr_Keith: I'll take a look at the thread, Matthew.
CSS View Transitions
<matatk> w3c/
Pointer Events Level 3
<matatk> w3c/
<matatk> What's changed: https://
matatk: If any of you have longstanding accessibility concerns with the above, we're at the point where feedback is critical.
new on TR http://www.w3.org/TR/tr-status-drafts.html
Roy: Nothing new on TR this week.
CSS Update (Paul) https://github.com/w3c/css-a11y/issues
Actions Checkin (Specs) issues/assigned
Task Force & Deliverables Updates
RQTF
janina: Expect a receive a request to advance CTAUR next week. We had a wide public review quite some time ago. We've had several drafts on CTAUR (collaborative tools). Trying to extrapolate what accessibility requirements are in collaborative environments. Had a lot of comments from COGA.
<Fredrik> Not to put too fine a point on it, but Zoom would technically also fall under CTAUR.
<matatk> Collaboration Tools Accessibility User Requirements (CTAUR): https://
janina: What we haven't had is enough review from a wider audience. If things go as planned, APA will publish a wide-review draft of CTAUR.
janina: We decided to do an Accessibility User Requirements for AI. We'll be looking for comments and participants.
<Fazio> Absolutely
<Fredrik> Could we pleasepleaseplease find a way to call it AINUR? #TolkienFandom
<Fazio> relates to maturity model
janina: Main problem is to scope this work appropriately. We need to ensure proper scoping.
<Dr_Keith> are we looking at AI experience, delivery of content, or user interfaces
Fazio: Might be a tricky one. Will be complex given all the circumstances around LLMs and functional considerations etc.
janina: A need is one thing. Getting work done in that AI accessibility area is a different thing.
mike_beganyi: Interested in getting involved in this - is there a link I can follow?
<Fredrik> Apart form Jutta Treveranus, I would also give a heads-up about Klaus Miesenberger and the Linz Uni's work on AI.
janina: The link is in the doc; RQTF call is the hour before APA.