Meeting minutes
AGL: FIDO SPWG Are finishing up their requirements document, no progress on caching yet
Pull Requests
w3c/
Skipping until David Waite is present
Pascoe: Waiting for further approvals
Nina has approved, AGL cedes his approval to Nina
Christiaan is currently OoO for the next two weeks
AGL: I'd potentially like to move this out of L3, depending on where we want to cut off L3 commmitments
Tony: Willing to put this at at-risk
David Turner to reach out to Rolf
Shane: if there's text change required then we should hold off, but otherwise we should contact Monty and ask him which path to pick
ACTION: David Turner to reach out to Monty
Issues
ACTION: AGL Volunteers to respond
Emil not on call
Rolf to attend next week
Tim: I did create an additional Issue to reflect the alternative to this: w3c/
w3c/
Anders: would this allow for tracking? You could potentially fingerprint users
AGL: Multiple RPs can poentially see the delta between auth being performed
Matthew: All this occurs after ceremony
Discussion around rounding time of response to prevent direct fingerprinting of times
Shane: This could be a storm in a teacup a bit, unsure of what this marker could be used to achieve
Anders: I want to consider the privacy concerns of it
Discussion around possibly rounding the time delta
Nina: You might want to have some noise added to it, but you'd want to make sure RPs can't request multiple assertions for the purpose of tracking
Matthew: What about having the RP provide an acceptable timeframe and the authenticator responds with a boolean?
Tim: essentially what Rolf is proposing
Shane: leaning towards Nina's idea of adding noise
Anders agrees
AGL drops link in chat https://
AGL: This has some concepts relevant to the discussion
Discussion around rounding and/or adding noise to response
Tim to iterate on the request with feedback from discussions
Going back to Pull Request w3c/
AGL: I am ok with this
oops I meant w3c/
Emil: APhillips current wording regarding Unicode encoding would be a breaking change
… planning to push back on that
Emil: This pull request has kind of grown to encompass two things though, what Adam addressed and this other issue
Rolf will be joining March 6th to discuss
Emil: Pull Request has opened today for this w3c/
Emil: The person that opened this is happy to close after the solution offered in #2029
AGL and Shane say it should be merged
it is done
Matt: I have no progress on this
Ackshay not present to discuss
Emil: This is not very high priority, should ask John B if this is still relevant
Emil: Mike Jones can you have a look?
Mike agrees to review
General Issues and Discussion
Emil wishes to discuss w3c/
Emil wishes to close 2024 if there are no differing opinions
none
Matt: Did get confirmation of F2F plans? Are we doing this in April on the 19th?
AGL: Meant to ask Christiaan but he is away. The event is in our system but unprocessed. I suspect we'll be able to host but it's not confirmed
Suspected to host near IIW still within the Mountain View area (near the museum)
End meeting