<shawn> agenda order 1, 3, 2
<shawn> agenda order 3, 1, 2
scribe+
shawn: You may recall, last Sept we were working on vision and strategic planning
<shawn> discussions https://github.com/w3c/wai-mission/discussions
<shawn> priorities for 2024 https://wai-mission.netlify.app/draft/#2024-priorities-and-specific-objectives
shawn: we have drafted priorities and would like to discuss them
lisa: I find missing is WAI's
main job: enable and promote make ALL the web accessible to ALL
people with disabilities.
... people with Cognitive disabilities, and other disabilities
as well, have not been addresses as well as others
... the end-user isn't mentioned
... it does mention incremental steps that we need to get to
these important goals
... bottom line, it does not capture the mission of equity and
human rights
Matt_King: The mission statement has "strategies, standards, and supporting", and does not have the word "all" in front of "disabilities
lisa: We need the word,
"all"
... to make the web accessible to ALL people with ALL TYPES OF
disabilities.
... a lot of things in WAI-Adapt now, were things we proposed
to ARIA at the start
... the scope feels like it has narrowed
... perhaps also move from WEB accessibility to DIGITAL
accessibility
shawn: I hear the discussion
item, to add "ALL" to the mission
... the topic of web v digital is a larger and well known
topic
lisa: If the 1st thing in our vision is to harmonize, we may be forced to 'cut a group'
kevin: We are already facing
harmonization demands. Understand that harmonization might
involve some exclusion
... we could stress building or developing standards that are
inclusive to ALL people with ALL types of disabilities
Matt_King: Digital v web is even
more important due to the EAA
... I see tremendous industry and investment on the part of
companies vying to get into a better position before June
2025
... we will have to double down on WCAG2ICT
... it appears EAA will line up with WCAG 2.2 and this will be
incorporated into EN 301 549
<shawn> https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/non-web-ict/
Matt_King: WCAG2ICT is a note being written to address this issue
<kevin> scribe+ kevin
<kevin> Lionel_Wolberger: Slightly different topic, bullet 4 'everyone who creates or manages *has* ...'
<kevin> ... I would suggest some more practical. For example 'has access to'
<kevin> ... 'has' could be over reaching, wish it wasn't but could be
<kevin> shawn: Intention for the Vision is to be the big picture, the dream
<kevin> scribe- kevin
<kevin> scribe+ kevin
<kevin> Matt_King: One other bit, there is somethign related to AT that is missing from the Vision
<kevin> ... Even if everything on the Vision is true, if we don't have AT harmonization and interoperability then nothing matters
<kevin> ... The last mile to the user has to work and be predictable
<kevin> ... If devs can't predict what happens in the last mile then they can't build things
<kevin> shawn: Add to third bullet?
<kevin> Matt_King: Possibly, but AT isn't necessarily seen as Tools, but might work
<kevin> shawn: Will send out in email for additional input
This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/WCAG to ICT/WCAG2ICT/ Present: Shawn, kevin, valerie_young, lisa, Lionel_Wolberger, Daniel, Matt_King No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Lionel_Wolberger Inferring Scribes: Lionel_Wolberger WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth WARNING: No date found! Assuming today. (Hint: Specify the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.) Or specify the date like this: <dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]