Meeting minutes
PROPOSED: Approve previous minutes https://
+1
<YoucTagh> +1
<roba> +0
RESOLUTION: Approve previous minutes
Update regarding timing of the group
pchampin: Charter runs until end of June 2024
roba: We'll work backward from that to get a draft for comment
pchampin: We need minimum 28 days for feedback, then it can go to PR
… then probably a month for transition from PR to REC
… so we need to gp to CR two months before end of charter
roba: So we aim to finalise end of March 2024
pchampin: We also need to have implementation report by end of April 2024
roba: Nick has one implementation, OGC has an own implementation, too
YoucTagh: Have implementation, too (Issue 57)
… waiting for input from Nick
roba: Will have a look at that, too
… any need for input ro finalise or is it only about feedback
YoucTagh: No, no additional input (except feedback) required
… but please check implementation
roba: Do we need two separate implementations for each feature?
pchampin: Yes, we need two separate implementations for each feature
roba: OK, will look into that together wich Nick, will put others as "feature as risk"
LarsG: No, no plans for implementation
pchampin: Charter says "two implementations for each fallback mechanism" (whatever that may mean)
YoucTagh: Documents refer to "the workshop", where fallbacks are "header based" an "URL-based"
roba: We should aim to have separate implementations of each feature
… with feature being "way of implementation"
YoucTagh: Haven't updated implementation report yet
roba: So that's an issue for both of us
YoucTagh: Have updated references in Impl. Report (Issue 58)
Liaison with IETF
pchampin: We need to sort this out before CR
… have sent mail to IETF people (mnot etc.)
… no reply so far. Will reach out again
roba: Can reach out too, mnot is in convenient time zone
ACTION: roba to reach out to mnot as soon as pchampin has reached out again
Open pull requests
https://
PR 60
roba: review done, will merge
PR 48
roba: will reach out to Nick about this one
Next meeting
roba: Everyone can to January 10, so we stick to that one
pchampin: Will mark the event on December 27 as cancelled
Open Issues
https://
Issue 62
YoucTagh: Typo in document. Will propose PR
Issue 61
YoucTagh: inconsistent use of text/xml vs. application/xml
… we should use one consistently
LarsG: We should use application/xml (the other is discouraged)
roba: So we change text/xml to application/xml everywhere
… do we need to check implementations, too?
… At least request/response should be.
… Assign Nick and roba
YoucTagh: Will make PR
Issue 57
roba: Will add description of new Implementation (DCN) to implementation report
Issue 52
YoucTagh: Doesn't seen to need fixing
roba: Haven't implemented this feature
YoucTagh: Me neither
roba: Will assign self and Nick to ensure that implementations are consistent
pchampin: What about the discussion of range /w3c/
roba: Will talk to Nick about that.
… Is everyone fine with merging once the issues are fixed?
<Everyone nods>
YoucTagh: Have created PR 63 for Issue 62
roba: Approved
roba: Can we delete branches after merging?
pchampin: There is no global policy, but yes, it makes sense.
YoucTagh: And one for the xml media types (PR 64)
roba: approved and merged
Issue 44
YoucTagh: Is marked as due for closing
roba: We should reference the resolution (which is PR 46)
<roba> seasons greetings!