Meeting minutes
Categorizing and completing issues and PRs before the charter ends
Tony has marked open issues with an "at risk" tag to denote that it may be at risk for completion before the working group loses its charter
By the next meeting they should be moved to their own section for viewing/completion
TPAC Schedule
<plh>
The Working Group will be meeting at TPAC in Seville on Monday and Tuesday, the CG also will be present at TPAC
Open Pull Requests
Emil: This is currently on hold until we decide if we're to add the challenge callback
MattMiller: Waiting for emlun to review
Tony: if emlun approves, any issues with merging?
No issues from those present
Matt Miller : this is fine to merge
AGL: janitorial
Tim: Resolved open comments, only unresolved comment is Nick's summary (which requires no action)
This is waiting for review by agl and jbradley
Potentially waiting for review approval
Mmiller: this would be helpful from the RP perspective, willing to approve but interested in other opinions
agl: Chrome would honor hinting if the RP provides it
Discussion around how a client hint might cause contradictions
with other fields in the authenticator request
Shane: going to add an editorial PR to indicate that userHandle has a secondary purpose: allowing authenticators to know when they have to replace a discoverable credential. I'm not going to remove any wording about account lookup
Shane: I think that there's an associated item here about whether the handle should be compulsory, this is covered in w3c/
Will try to address both topics in a single PR
ACTION: Shane to create PR with link and resolutions to 1892 and 1909 for next WG meeting
There are implementation issues and concerns outlined in the comments.
Marked with at @Risk tag
If someone is willing to tackle this then rm the risk tag and assign
Emil: Functionality for this already exists
ACTION: Nick Steele to close out 1890 with comment/redirection to CG
Marked @Risk
AGL: Arnar currently on leave, probably doesn't want this to get nixed
Mmiller to review
Chair is experiencing internet woes
AGL running agenda in his stead
AGL interested in this work, are other people interested in taking this on?
Discussion around usecases
Tim: Does this require a change to credman?
AGL: Nina believes so
Consensus on the call is yes