Meeting minutes
HAPI
eric: Still working on jena shex. Got "extends" working. Yobka's working on semantics for "extends". After that we'll be able to validate all of deepak's shex against the FHIR examples.
… Claude also make progress on shexJ.
… Got travel plans for Japan, where CLaude and I wll work on adding SPARQL support to HAPI.
dbooth: Any coordination needed w larger FHIR group, about API?
eric: THere's a DB way to ask FHIRpath querie.
… If we can compile SPARQL queries into FHIRpath objects, then we'll be able to talk to whatever.
Concept IRIS
gaurav: Two issues in the same state.
https://
https://
gaurav: Wrote a scala program that looks at repo that lists all code systems and naming sytems, so we can figure out what needs IRI stems.
… There's a whole bunch of things inthe UTG repo that are solely intended for use in FHIR. They can mint their own IRI stems. These are hl7 code systems, even if they're from other orgs. We can mint IRI stems for those. The bigger thing is external code systems -- outside of FHIR. We'll need to work with those orgs on those.
eric: How much should we emphasize that those are resolvable? Should we wait for them to be resolvable before making them official?
gaurav: After we identify code sys / naming sys w IRI stems, we'll be making UTG proposals to put them in. And we should prioritize the ones that are resolvable or on wikidata.
eric: Should decide how much to push them for stable resolvable URLs.
dbooth: Would be interesting to know what is the rate of increase of terminologies on terminology.hl7.org
ADJOURNED