<CarlosD> scribe+ giacomo-petri

zakim take up next

Call for review https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/461

Carlos: no calls for review

Assigned issues https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen

<Wilco> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/2041

Carlos: I remind everyone to take some time to review

<Wilco> https://deploy-preview-98--wai-evaluation-tools-list.netlify.app/tools-list/evaluation/

Wilco: I have been working on updated tools to how some of the rules are presented on w3c
... I've been working on education groups to add implemenation data to the evaluation tools list

<CarlosD> scribe+ CarlosD

<CarlosD> giacomo-petri: https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/2007 is ready to review

<CarlosD> giacomo-petri: https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/2038 also ready

Update from the ACT Task Force https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/522/files

Wilco: working on subjective applicabilities (1h ago), to understand if it's something we want to allow
... the goal is to include also rules that might not have a objective applicability

TPAC F2F meeting

Carlos: is it confirmed?

Wilco: confirmed if we want

Carlos: when?

Wilco: our dates not 100% confirmed

Carlos: lot of issues opened, regarding the visible label as part of the acc name
... focusing now on 2051 and 1615, Wilco convincing arguments about not allowing the acc name to be written differently from the visible label
... about these 2 issues we want to have those as fail examples
... anyone has different opinions?

Wilco: agree

Sean: agree

<harris> +1

Giacomo: agree

<Karen> +1

Kathy: agree

Carlos: regarding 1458, which Dan is working on implementing an algorithm, is trying to address the edge cases

Kathy: about <button aria-label="How are you"> <span>you</span> <span>How</span> <span>are</span> </button>, do we all agree that this should fail?
... and <a aria-label="WAVE" href="#">W A V E</a> is a failure

Carlos: the behaviour we want to fail is to insert spaces where there are none

Kathy: <a aria-label="1a" href="#">1</a> what about this one? It passes but I'm not sure it should pass

<Sean> Bookdeal

<Sean> sidereal

Carlos: we should fail it instead of pass
... should we fail also <a aria-label="fibonacci: 0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34">fibonacci: 0112358132134</a> instead of passing it?

Giacomo: agree

<harris> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/2040

<Sean> I need to drop. Thank you all much. I might chat about this at Optum as well.

<CarlosD> CarlosD: is the example in 2040 a failure of 2.5.3 or not?

<CarlosD> ... The group presents arguments for failing and passing and no conclusion is reached

<CarlosD> Wilco: I might open an issue about this with the WG

<CarlosD> CarlosD: let's get back to this in the next meeting

This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/fromt he/from the/
Succeeded: s/ad fail/as fail/
Default Present: Karen, Sean, giacomo-petri, CarlosD, Wilco, harris, kathy_
Present: Karen, Sean, giacomo-petri, CarlosD, Wilco, harris, kathy_
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: giacomo-petri
Inferring Scribes: giacomo-petri

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth


WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)