– DRAFT –
AG-Equity-2023-01-23

Review sub-group recommendations report

<JenStrickland> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lMYbFlUVhWSKaEnrzUfpozdXybkL2U8jTgWUKq59zjc/edit?usp=sharing

<JenStrickland> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lMYbFlUVhWSKaEnrzUfpozdXybkL2U8jTgWUKq59zjc/edit?usp=sharing

<bruce_bailey> see slide for recommendations, possible future actions

Sheri: Maturity Model in the process of changing from a CG to a TF to detach it from AGWG

<bruce_bailey> MM moving from AG CG to TF under APA

<bruce_bailey> PWE might be model for Equity

<tzviya> Tzviya: Someone pointed out that we don't want to lose sight of making sure that WCAG is equitable

<bruce_bailey> PWE home page is: https://www.w3.org/Consortium/pwe/

Tzviya: We can't spread the equity process until the ERB is established

Sheri_BH: Could be to add Equity as a dimension to MM

<bruce_bailey> PWE grew into a horizontal review board, which could be good long-term goal for Equity

https://www.w3.org/community/pwe/ is a better link if you're interesting in joining

<bruce_bailey> slide four is purpose and implementation vs three recommendations

<bruce_bailey> (moved to end of deck)

Tzviya: only the HRB needs to go to AB/AC

Tzviya: you only need five people to start a CG, and we have five people on this call

Tzviya: The ideas get fleshed out in the CG, then go to AB/AC

Tzviya: AC first

Tzviya: go to the TAG and other groups after AC

Tzviya: let's get rid of some of the text and provide a link to the CG webpage

Danielle: we need to make sure the document is consumable by everyone.

Danielle: We should also add an acronyms slide

<JenStrickland> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Px1Aaf_LrXSJl2L7Hb00n7nMKWXlD4jPjGJiBSSUHpA/edit?usp=sharing

tzviya: CG docs (Process and Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct) need to be approved by AB then the AC

<bruce_bailey> https://www.w3.org/TR/maturity-model/

<bruce_bailey> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/maturity-model/

model after https://w3ctag.github.io/security-questionnaire/

Tzviya: it's hard to write a specification that guarantees equity, the security and I18N questionnaires provide a good structure

Jen: add to next steps identify chairs, consider representation

Jen: recruit more people to join PWE

Tzviya: and contribute to PWE

Jen: include links and calendar notes

Jen: should we discuss at member meetings?

Tzviya: Yes, you can bring it up

clicked a bad button sorry

<bruce_bailey> https://w3c.github.io/maturity-model/#personnel

Tzviya: PWE should look at how to use MM

<JenStrickland> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lMYbFlUVhWSKaEnrzUfpozdXybkL2U8jTgWUKq59zjc/edit?usp=sharing

Danielle: what is the timeframe for the next steps?

Jen: more immediate there are a lot of things we need to do and we need to get more folx involved before we can tackle some of the longer term stuff

https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZIpdO6tqTsiE9edqvKXYwdfOZriV7dILZBq?utm_source=Rosenfeld+Media&utm_campaign=3e04baf7ae-enterprise+videoconference+January+2023&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_2533ff0141-3e04baf7ae-345381667&mc_cid=3e04baf7ae&mc_eid=931a132266

Seminar on Ethical use of design systems

Tzviya: will add some changes to make it clear what each recommendation is for

Tzviya: will let Sheri know when she's done with the structural changes to the PPT