Meeting minutes
<Jem> rragent, make mimunites
<Jem> https://
Setup and Review Agenda
Next meeting, Jan. 23rd
Report on status of site updates
<Jem> Content restructure is merged but publication delayed due to technical problem in WAI site build process.
matt: error occurred when updates went live
matt: we're waiting for W3C to get the new version of the site published.
Jem: will communicate with Michael Cooper about the current status
<Jem> Work still in progress on restructure and improvement of About Page -- PR 2558
matt: more work is needed for the PR
<Jem> 2558
matt: visual design work may be ready for review by next week
<Jem> Work still in progress on issue 2535 -- Same level navigation on Single Pattern and Single Practice pages
matt: ready to go but delayed by the restructure publish delay
matt: hope to make more improvement for workflow, some improvement made last year
Review Implementation of First AT Support Table
matt: The AIRA AT project started 2018,
matt: screen reader support onboard, JAWS, NVDA (Chrome), VoiceOver (Safari)
matt: soon more data will be be refreshed by robots
matt: implementing Issac's design: Preview of button example page with AT support table
<Jem> Matt's feedback https://
Jem: what is the status of candidate report? approved or unapproved?
matt: candidate report is unapproved and we can make the warning message pane collapsible
Jem: none means "no data available" yet
matt: what's the difference between "data yet not available" or "no data"?
MarkMcCarthy: Change to "Jaws for window" and "NVDA for window" may be more consistent and clear.
matt: if we have two strings, "not applicable" or "n/a" for Jaws and NVDA and "no data yet" for VoiceOver
Jem: "not applicable" works for the mobile view
james: spell out and use "not applicable"
matt: should the accessible name of the buttons be changed?
MarkMcCarthy: change "embed" to "get embed link"?
2023 APG TF Vision
Jem: how will the APG Task Force change in 2023? How will APG change in 2023?
matt: we've completed the redesign and have a new platform. What would the membership and participation of the task force look like?
Jem: currently we have a couple of U of I people.
james: it will great if we continute to work on creating new patterns.
matt: the work of the task force could have broader appeal? Can we offer workshops or discussion to attract more participation?
<Jem> I like Matt's "workshopy" idea
MarkMcCarthy: how to advertise and highlight incentives?