Meeting minutes
Go through the pull request list
https://
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/504
Eric: Looks good to me
Eric: let's merge it
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/503
xfq: Richard added some comments
https://
[Discuss the English translation]
huijing: I'll reply to Richard
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/501
[Discuss the English translation]
Zhengyu: I'll update the English text
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/492
Zhengyu: Infra can be used as a reference
xfq: Infra aims to define the fundamental concepts upon which standards are built
All: agreed with Zhengyu's opinion
[Discuss 'digit' vs. 'numeral']
Zhengyu: I'll update the PR
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/pull/489
huijing: This is a long-standing PR, I hope it can be merged soon
All: agree to merge
Go through the issue list
https://
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/506
Eric: 首/尾 should be used
xfq: I'll work on a PR for this issue
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/505
Eric: The current text is not very good
Eric: How should we update it?
Eric: We have no way to count Mainland China or Hong Kong publications
Zhengyu: "ancient publications" are not well defined
"As with book title mark type A (wavy low lines), proper noun marks are rarely used in modern publications, but they can still be seen in some textbooks and ancient publications"
huijing: We can simply remove this sentence ^
… it is of little value
"Book title mark type A is rarely used in modern publications, but can still be seen in some textbooks and ancient publications."
Eric: this sentence should also be removed ^
huijing: agreed
… I'll send a PR
Eric: please reply to the issue
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/502
xfq: we need more figures for text decoration
Eric: please assign it to me
https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/500
[xfq introduces the issue]
Zhengyu: bottom to top has a disadvantage
Zhengyu: If there is vertical scrolling, it is possible to not be able to see how much progress on the current viewport
Zhengyu: it may appear below the fold
xfq: agreed
Eric: agreed
huijing: agreed
… although in the current Firefox it is bottom to top
… I think it should follow the direction of the text
Zhengyu: I think there is no absolute right or wrong answer
Zhengyu: everyone's feelings are different
Zhengyu: Some people think it should be consistent with the direction of the text
Zhengyu: some people think it should be consistent with the earth's gravity and thermometer
huijing: I find it unnatural to be inconsistent with the text direction
huijing: So our consensus is it should be top to bottom
huijing: we can discuss with the HTML folks
Eric: agreed
huijing: I'll reply to the issue
Related issue in jlreq: https://
Zhengyu: Firefox may refer to the opinions of Japanese experts
huijing: it would be ideal if the direction can be controlled with CSS
Zhengyu: I agree, but we're discussing the default direction
Next teleconference time
December 20 (Tuesday), 19:00-20:00 (UTC+8)