– DRAFT –
DXWG DCAT subgroup

<RiccardoAlbertoni> PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2022/11/03-dxwgdcat-minutes

<Nobu_Ogura> 0 not present

<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1

+1

RESOLUTION: approve last meeting minutes https://www.w3.org/2022/11/03-dxwgdcat-minutes

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2022.11.15

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1538

RiccardoAlbertoni: I think this is now complete and made the changes as discussed - can we review/approve?
… not much to discuss - if people can look at this over the next couple of days

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1508 needs Andrea to discuss.

<RiccardoAlbertoni> PR #1542 PR #1542

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1542

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/&doc2=https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/DCAT-issue-1526-bis/dcat/index.html#security_and_privacy

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WX1TVE22AaUOSSkjunI9tvXFVF6gj5AhCVJsPHTrYXw/edit

RiccardoAlbertoni: Several people have contributed. Suggest if the meeting is happy we promote to ready for review, merge and reply.
… This expresses the overall WG view that this is a complicated area that runs beyond our group as well as responses to the specific items

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WX1TVE22AaUOSSkjunI9tvXFVF6gj5AhCVJsPHTrYXw/edit

RiccardoAlbertoni: Nick makes the point that W3 WG can't expect each implementation to solve this problem on their own

DaveBrowning: The reply looks good to me. We can play our part, but it needs to be part of a larger activity that covers many areas.
… Lots of potential complexity in the relationship between the catalog record and the dataset itself

RiccardoAlbertoni: Probably not appropriate to suggest a particular way since it could easily restrict re-use.

Nobu_Ogura: I agree. Perhaps we can emphasise that we are focussed on the catalog not the data itself.

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1524

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/31

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/milestone/15

RiccardoAlbertoni: These milestones have got a bit confusing.

<Tidying up takes place.... Clarification on Future work tag etc>

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1541

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/dcat/#Property:resource_relation

RiccardoAlbertoni: I'll prepare a PR.

<RiccardoAlbertoni> proposed: adding dcat:hasVersion in the list as a more specific case of dcterms:hasVersion

+1

<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1

<Nobu_Ogura> +1

RESOLUTION: adding dcat:hasVersion in the list as a more specific case of dcterms:hasVersion

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1539

RiccardoAlbertoni: Suggest we align with the original ADMS spec

RiccardoAlbertoni: I will put together a PR

<RiccardoAlbertoni> proposed: align with the original ADMS spec

<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1

<Nobu_Ogura> +1

+1

RESOLUTION: align with the original ADMS spec

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1540

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1527

DaveBrowning: I'll have a look at this and see what might fit.