Meeting minutes
<RiccardoAlbertoni> PROPOSED: approve last meeting minutes https://
<Nobu_Ogura> 0 not present
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
+1
RESOLUTION: approve last meeting minutes https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: I think this is now complete and made the changes as discussed - can we review/approve?
… not much to discuss - if people can look at this over the next couple of days
https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> PR #1542 PR #1542
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: Several people have contributed. Suggest if the meeting is happy we promote to ready for review, merge and reply.
… This expresses the overall WG view that this is a complicated area that runs beyond our group as well as responses to the specific items
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: Nick makes the point that W3 WG can't expect each implementation to solve this problem on their own
DaveBrowning: The reply looks good to me. We can play our part, but it needs to be part of a larger activity that covers many areas.
… Lots of potential complexity in the relationship between the catalog record and the dataset itself
RiccardoAlbertoni: Probably not appropriate to suggest a particular way since it could easily restrict re-use.
Nobu_Ogura: I agree. Perhaps we can emphasise that we are focussed on the catalog not the data itself.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: These milestones have got a bit confusing.
<Tidying up takes place.... Clarification on Future work tag etc>
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: I'll prepare a PR.
<RiccardoAlbertoni> proposed: adding dcat:hasVersion in the list as a more specific case of dcterms:hasVersion
+1
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
<Nobu_Ogura> +1
RESOLUTION: adding dcat:hasVersion in the list as a more specific case of dcterms:hasVersion
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
RiccardoAlbertoni: Suggest we align with the original ADMS spec
RiccardoAlbertoni: I will put together a PR
<RiccardoAlbertoni> proposed: align with the original ADMS spec
<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1
<Nobu_Ogura> +1
+1
RESOLUTION: align with the original ADMS spec
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://
DaveBrowning: I'll have a look at this and see what might fit.