W3C

- DRAFT -

ACT Rules Community Group Teleconference

27 Oct 2022

Attendees

Present
giacomo-petri, Jean-Yves, Wilco, Helen_, harris, Aron
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
giacomo-petri

Contents


<Jean-Yves> scribe: giacomo-petri

Call for review https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/461

Jean-Yves: few items in call for Review

Assigned issues + help wanted https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues?page=1&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen

<Wilco> https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1621

#1621 relates with #1939

Jean-Yves: #1621 relates with #1939
... Lot of issue with help wanted label so if someone want to take them.. really appreciated

Update from the ACT Task Force https://github.com/w3c/wcag-act/pull/522/files

Wilco: we are working on rules format including secondary requirements

Update from Manual Test Rules subgroups https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1952

Helen_: working on rules format

meta refresh (no exceptions) examples should not fail SC 2.2.1 https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/pull/1958

Jean-Yves: AAA requirement about meta refresh

Wilco: problem is: lot of test cases which faile both A and AAA criteria

Jean-Yves: with secondary requirements we want to allow implementors to implement A and AA but not necessary AAA

Need some way to record accessibility support data https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1939

Jean-Yves: now we have a generic feedback saying that some UA/AT has known issues, but that way is hard to keep track of which technology is not working to revisit it

Aron: I'd like to help with this one starting from few issues

Should "option" be tested under Form field has name? https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules.github.io/issues/1929

Wilco: is option elements user interface components that require an accessible name? They are not user interface components at all, but they need a value
... there is plenty of options with empty value (e.g. default one) to erase the field

Aron: I think that elements with role="option" should be included into this rule, even if the element is mapped in Safari as static text.

Jean-Yves: we need to make some AT testing (screen reader)

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

[End of minutes]

Minutes manually created (not a transcript), formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.200 (CVS log)
$Date: 2022/10/27 15:01:56 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision VERSION of 2020-12-31
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Default Present: giacomo-petri, Jean-Yves, Wilco, Helen_, harris
Present: giacomo-petri, Jean-Yves, Wilco, Helen_, harris, Aron
Found Scribe: giacomo-petri
Inferring ScribeNick: giacomo-petri

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth


WARNING: No date found!  Assuming today.  (Hint: Specify
the W3C IRC log URL, and the date will be determined from that.)
Or specify the date like this:
<dbooth> Date: 12 Sep 2002

People with action items: 

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: IRC log location not specified!  (You can ignore this 
warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain 
a link to the original IRC log.)


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]