Meeting minutes
Ballot comments
dbooth: comments due Oct 14. Rob Hausam will file on our behalf.
Ballot process: http://
ACTION: DBooth to draft ballot comments for Rob Hausam
Scripts to convert FHIR RDF to ontology friendly RDF
eric: Don't want to reinvent all of R4 RDF. We only want to add indexes.
dbooth: Another possibility would be to gen R4 RDF
eric: But that would be harder, because we'd have to fully qualify all the property names -- we'd have to know all of them.
dbooth: We'd have to generate a big lookup table of everything in the hierarchy.
option 1: add explicit indexes without changing property names
option: Generate R4, which has explicit indexes and fully qualified property names
option 3: Change the rdf: namespace of the of the list predicates to nonRdf: namespace.
eric: Options 1 and 2 will help SPARQL users, but not option 3.
dbooth: I'd like to help both SPARQL and OWL users with the same generator.
eric: What's good for OWL is not necessarily the same as what's good for SPARQL.
dbooth: How much do we care about generating an explicit index for SPARQL users?
eric: Most users who care about the order of items in a list will want the first element, which is easy to get with SPARQL without an explicit index.
AGREED: We don't need to gen an explicit index
gaurav: Should we document the nonRdf: namespace?
dbooth: We could, to make it standard.
gaurav: Like the idea of making it dereferenceable to an explanation.
gaurav: Could use figshare for the document
jim: Could use a w3id
dbooth: Or it could go to the FHIR rdf.html page, as an anchor
dbooth: Preferences?
jim: w3id or github
gaurav: figshare or github
eric: rdf.html
houcemeddine: Suggest w3id, https://
dbooth: Could use the fhir: namespace
jim: Could do fhir:rdfFirst and fhir:rdfRest
dbooth: Or fhir:f and fhir:r
AGREED: Use the fhir: namesAPCE
AGREED: Use fhir:rdfFirst and fhir:rdfRest for OWL-friendly lists.
eric: What about literals?
jim: For literals we could use fhir:rdfFirstLiteral
AGREED: Use fhir:rdfFirstLiteral for literal predicate
eric: Only care about literals if you're using a list and wanto to preserve order and you're doing a logical model that has those.
ACTION: Jim to propose SPARQL to for list conversion
Concept IRIs
gaurav: Hope to have something to share by next Thursday
ADJOURNED