– DRAFT –
DXWG Plenary

Agenda management

Caroline_: maybe we could only use the W3C calendar rather than sending email
… we can still put the link to the agenda in the calendar entry

pchampin: by default, an email is sent when you update the calendar entry

Caroline_: yes, but we didn't use the calendar before.

<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1 to have the agenda embedded in thje calendar

<Nobu_OGURA> +1

<annette_g> +1

<Caroline_> +1

Caroline_: I can send an email to the group to inform everyone that from now on,
… they will be notified of meetings through the calendar system.

+1

Caroline_: if you want to insert content in the plenary meeting agenda,
… anyone on the WG has permission to change it on the wiki.

last plenary meeting minutes

<Caroline_> https://www.w3.org/2022/06/07-dxwg-minutes

<Caroline_> +1

<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1

+0

<Nobu_OGURA> +1

<annette_g> +1

updates

RiccardoAlbertoni: progress on the horizontal reviews

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/issues/184

RiccardoAlbertoni: i18n has commented on our response
… We still need to merge a PR.
… We should soon get their approval.

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1515

RiccardoAlbertoni: Andrea has drafted an checklist for the TAG review.
… I suggest we review it during this meeting, so that we can send it quickly.

<RiccardoAlbertoni> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1515

RiccardoAlbertoni: there is a quick explanation about DCAT
… then Andrea has prepared an explainer, which describes the evolution of DCAT,
… as well as use-cases and requirements.
… We explain that DCAT3 addresses some leftovers from DCAT2.
… My proposal is to keep the explaine as it is. Any comment?

<Zakim> Caroline_, you wanted to change my affiliation for Invited Expert

Caroline_: looks fine, except for my affiliation

RiccardoAlbertoni: many affiliations have changed recently
… Not sure what's the W3C policy here.

pchampin: I would keep the most recent affiliation.

RiccardoAlbertoni: I guess that Andrea tried to be consistent with the affiliations on the last WD

Caroline_: I get it, but I think it is important to change it

RiccardoAlbertoni: some items in the checklist have been struck through,
… as they don't seem relevant for DCAT.

<Caroline_> Pierre-Antoine: my impression is that only the Github URL is required

<Caroline_> ... I would repeat it even if sounds redundant

RiccardoAlbertoni: ok, done
… I drafted a paragraph for 'Major unresolved issues'

annette_g: I think it looks good, it is an accurate description of what we did.

RiccardoAlbertoni: we have the option to have all the TAG feedback in one issue, or one issue per comment.
… I suggest we go for the 1st option (one single issue for all comments)
… We have to decide on what date we require their feedback.
… I'm suggesting October, as we are sending the request 1 month later than the other requests.

Caroline_: +1

new charter

https://www.w3.org/2022/06/dx-wg-charter.html

"A new Internet Draft on profile negotiation currently under development at IETF with input from the Dataset Exchange Working Group,"

pchampin: this sentence in the charter was challended by John C Klensin

https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1523

pchampin: this PR was supposed to improve that, but I forgot about it in the rush
… and it is not part of the published charter
… Let's see how much trouble it would be to update the charter after the fact,
… and if it is worth it.

<RiccardoAlbertoni> +1 to check if worth the throuble..

pchampin: I'll check with PLH and the others.

AOB

Caroline_: anything else?
… Anyone going to TPAC?

annette_g: I'm planning to attend remotely

Caroline_: I will not
… but looking forward to your feedback
… See you all back in September.