Meeting minutes
jpamental present+
Pull request review
Garret: PR 98 - intention to provide guidance to browsers around how this should work with HTTP cache
<Vlad> #98 (https://
Garret: changed the way the algorithm works so there are inputs to tune it's behavior and leverage cache
Garret: PR 100 - following discussions from last call about font collections - they are added in this PR. Added fields to identify fragment ID
<Vlad> https://
Garret: PR 102 - cleanup PR, nothing too big here. Instead of linking to the top level RFC it links to the relevant section and updating other references to the most recent RFC
Open issues (https://github.com/w3c/IFT/issues)
Skef: new issue. Updates related to 2 bugs
Garret: Haven't had a chance to review yet
Vlad: Skef, are these related to the issues you previously reported?
Skef: They are related, but new
Garret: If I understand it, you're looking to make the two approaches more independent. This seems reasonable
Skef: Yes - it should allow more independent development of different aspects of the spec
Skef: From our perspective, if we're going to do work on this we'd want to have access to the document scan
Garret: For now the spec doesn't deal with that, and not sure if we need to. It could be left to the browser (or JS developer) to handle as an implementation detail
Garret: I'll review and comment further with a little more time
Skef: I updated Issue 93 with more information
<Garret> https://
Garret: Skef, have you seen the web assembly demo? If not I'll send a link
Garret: We built the client and server in C++, and I built up the client in web assembly as well so I could run it in the browser
Vlad: Seems like all 3 issues we have now might benefit from a new section in the spec. Not sure if we can address it right now, but the discussion is ongoing
Vlad: Pretty confident we can do that before TPAC. My goal is to have it pretty well complete so we can share it there
Garret: That seems reasonable
Vlad: I reached out to Myles to find out status from him. He is now managing the group, and so has less time to devote to this. He confirmed he is still interested and indicated there may be someone else who might be able to help as well
Jason: Won't be able to get to TPAC in September, but can join remotely
scribe nick: garret
Vlad: in person attendance?
Skef: tuesday, wednesday
John: yes
Garret: yes
Sergey: yes
Bianca: no, but will join remotely if possible.
Vlad: re: planning.
Vlad: want spec to point where it can be shared with everyone.
Vlad: garret you mentioned making a video.
Garret: I will respond to the email asking for Demo's.
Vlad: I was contacted if we had something to talk about during atypi
Vlad: the video demo would be good for that.
Garret: agreed.
Vlad: will need to check if there's collision between the two events in sept.
Vlad: it will be the week before TPAC (sep. 1st - 3rd)
Garret: I should be able to do the demo.
Vlad: I'll respond accordingly
Vlad: not sure about Myle's attendance, will check in.
Vlad: FYI requirements for being tested before returning to the US have been lifted for 90 days, which covers to the end of TPAC.
Vlad: for the next call looks like the next available date would be the 26th.
Vlad: let's plan to keep working on the spec, addressing issues until then.
Vlad: so next call will be the 26th