Meeting minutes
Synchronization Accessibility User Requirements.
janina: Messaging has been forwarded and is being reviewed
Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA.
janina: Met with Mano along with Lionel
janina: Going to take advantage of advancing technology with the verifiable credentials working group
janina: Digital wallets are common now, but lack interoperability
janina: In the process, things like passwordless authentication is going in the right direction
jasonjgw: Privacy Pass authentication process is gaining attention
janina: Proxy approach for authentication is a growing trend
janina: Looking at what else can be done with the proxy approach, such as personalization for accessibility configuration
jasonjgw: Right now, we are continuing discussion with the relevant groups until enough is known to revise our document
jasonjgw: We can come back to thins in a few weeks
Accessibility of remote meetings.
jasonjgw: At this point, no substantive comments from the EO working group
jasonjgw: Can start thinking about the publication process
janina: Confirmed in the APA call
scott: We gave some advice on automated captions
scott: But not much included on how to turn them on
jasonjgw: The main concern is allowing automated captions to be turned on by an attendee without the meeting host having to enable it first
jasonjgw: Some small editorial concerns as well, but nothing major
scott: The note on captions makes sense and we can add it
scott: We can examine if our pointer to RTC is sufficient
janina: The caption issue is when the captions have not been prearranged
scott: When the interface makes it hard to enable automated captions is an issue
jasonjgw: Some technologies for the user to do this on a local machine are available
scott: Yes - Windows 11 has this capability
janina: Live meetings are often recorded and then uploaded online
janina: The quality of uploaded recorded captions should be improved before publishing - fixing spelling errors and so forth
janina: The live situation may be more out of sync, but after recording this should be better with closer synchronization
jasonjgw: some apps already provide useful ways of correcting spellings in caption files
janina: The tooling and process needs to also address syncronization
scott: Will look into updating the document to reflect this
scott: Sometimes people use open captions burned into the video, and those cannot be edited, so we'll need to consider how to address issues like that
jasonjgw: I think our approach is to mostly focus on the platform and tool vendors, not so much the meeting organizer
jasonjgw: Let's bring back in future meetings
janina: What about messaging?
jasonjgw: We have earlier versions we can amend
scott: glad to help with updating messaging
jasonjgw: Let's get the current issues resolved first
Accessibility of collaboration tools.
jasonjgw: Began working on a draft based on wiki content
jasonjgw: This is just a basic beginning
jasonjgw: Mostly looks at screen reader use cases so far, because the research base is heavy in that realm
janina: We should include editors notes to state these limitations
jasonjgw: Will open a new repository to deposit the document
jasonjgw: Other comments?
janina: We can look at low-vision and cognitive issues
janina: The ability to have multiple ways of viewing a document during the authoring process
jasonjgw: Intersections with learning and cognitive issues are going to be some of the most difficult
jasonjgw: Keeping the cognitive load under control is difficult
jasonjgw: One the repository is open, I will announce to the mailing list so we can all review
Potential accessibility-related use cases for reporting API.
jasonjgw: There is a wiki page which has been populated from recent meeting discussions
janina: Let's wait two weeks and bring up for meeting discussion
Natural Language Interface Accessibility User Requirements.
jasonjgw: Comments from Kim Patch have been mostly addressed
jasonjgw: Should we merge the changes?
jasonjgw: We have multiple branches with edits
scott: supports merging and accepting changes
jasonjgw: Will merge them; then we can take a look at the resulting documents for final reviews
janina: We should also update github issues with details of how each was addressed
jasonjgw: Other thoughts?
Miscellaneous topics.
jasonjgw: Nothing to bring up in the way of new topics